Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31000972›Full record

ReviewJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Treatment algorithm for spontaneous spinal infections: A review of the literature.

Fabrizio Gregori, Giovanni Grasso, Giancarlo Iaiani, Nicola Marotta, Fabio Torregrossa, Alessandro Landi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of suspected spinal infections from biopsy samples: a novel biopsy toolkit design and real-life diagnostic value.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Infection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Spondylodiscitis].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Surgery combined with antibiotics for thoracic vertebralWorld journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabrizio GregoriDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni GrassoDepartment of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giancarlo IaianiDepartment of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Aou Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Nicola MarottaDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Fabio TorregrossaDepartment of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Alessandro LandiDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary spinal infections are rare pathologies with an estimated incidence of 5% of all osteomyelitis. The diagnosis can be challenging and this might result in a late identification. The etiological diagnosis is the primary concern to determine the most appropriate treatment. The aim of this review article was to identify the importance of a methodological attitude toward accurate and prompt diagnosis using an algorithm to aid on spinal infection management.

methodsA search was done on spinal infection in some databases including PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Ebsco, Embasco, and Scopus.

resultsLiterature reveals that on the basis of a clinical suspicion, the diagnosis can be formulated with a rational use of physical, radiological, and microbiological examinations. Microbiological culture samples can be obtained by a percutaneous computed tomography-guided procedure or by an open surgical biopsy. When possible, the samples should be harvested before antibiotic treatment is started. Indications for surgical treatment include neurological deficits or sepsis, spine instability and/or deformity, presence of epidural abscess and failure of conservative treatment.

conclusionA multidisciplinary approach involving both a spinal surgeon and an infectious disease specialist is necessary to better define the treatment strategy. Based on literature findings, a treatment algorithm for the diagnosis and management of primary spinal infections is proposed.

Indexed as

Discitisprimary spinal infectionsspondylodiscitis

Identifiers

PMID31000972
PMCPMC6469318
OpenAlexW2937694792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.