Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31000909›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2019

Preliminary Results Comparing Thin Plate Splines with Finite Element Methods for Modeling Brain Deformation during Neurosurgery using Intraoperative Ultrasound.

S Frisken, M Luo, I Machado, P Unadkat, P Juvekar, A Bunevicius, M Toews, W M Wells, M I Miga, A J Golby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Intraoperative Imaging for High-Grade Glioma Surgery.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S FriskenDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
M LuoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
I MachadoInstituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, PORTUGAL.
P UnadkatDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
P JuvekarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
A BuneviciusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
M ToewsDépartement de Génie des Systems, Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, CANADA.
W M WellsDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
M I MigaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
A J GolbyDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
Multimodal Registration of the Brain's Cortical SurfaceR01NS049251 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GOLBY, ALEXANDRA J, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2005 to 2018
$6.7M
Continuous Compensation of Brain Shift during NeurosurgeryR01EB027134 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FRISKEN, SARAH · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027134NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS049251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain shift compensation attempts to model the deformation of the brain which occurs during the surgical removal of brain tumors to enable mapping of presurgical image data into patient coordinates during surgery and thus improve the accuracy and utility of neuro-navigation. We present preliminary results from clinical tumor resections that compare two methods for modeling brain deformation, a simple thin plate spline method that interpolates displacements and a more complex finite element method (FEM) that models physical and geometric constraints of the brain and its material properties. Both methods are driven by the same set of displacements at locations surrounding the tumor. These displacements were derived from sets of corresponding matched features that were automatically detected using the SIFT-Rank algorithm. The deformation accuracy was tested using a set of manually identified landmarks. The FEM method requires significantly more preprocessing than the spline method but both methods can be used to model deformations in the operating room in reasonable time frames. Our preliminary results indicate that the FEM deformation model significantly out-performs the spline-based approach for predicting the deformation of manual landmarks. While both methods compensate for brain shift, this work suggests that models that incorporate biophysics and geometric constraints may be more accurate.

Indexed as

brain shiftImage-guided neurosurgeryintraoperative ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31000909
PMCPMC6467062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.