Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31000893›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2019

Comparing the efficacy of aprepitant and ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV): A double blinded, randomised control trial in patients undergoing breast and thyroid surgeries.

Salome Jeyabalan, Suma Mary Thampi, Reka Karuppusami, Kunder Samuel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04810494 (Intranasal Lidocaine for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. A Prospective Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04810494 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Intranasal Lidocaine for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. A Prospective Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMilton S. Hershey Medical CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsPostoperative Nausea and VomitingArms2% Lidocaine HCl topical solution, 0.9% Sodium chloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Major Adverse Cardiac Events with Ondansetron: A Systematic Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Risk factors for nausea and vomiting after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salome JeyabalanDepartment of Anesthesia, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Suma Mary ThampiDepartment of Anesthesia, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Reka KaruppusamiDepartment of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kunder SamuelDepartment of Anesthesia, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christian Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAprepitant, a Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, has been evaluated in abdominal and neurosurgeries, but its effect is less clear in breast and thyroid surgeries, which are also known to be high risk for post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study was done to compare the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron and aprepitant in women undergoing mastectomy and thyroidectomy.

methodsOne hundred and twenty-five ASA I and II, female patients, aged between 18 and 65 years were randomly assigned into Group I (ondansetron group,

resultsIn the immediate postoperative period, 79.7% of patients in Group I and 85.2% in Group II were free of emesis (

conclusionA single dose of oral aprepitant has comparable effects to injection ondansetron administered eighth hourly in preventing PONV, the severity of nausea, number of rescue antiemetics, and the time to first emetic episode in the 24-h postoperative period. CTRI REG NO: REF/2017/06/014637.

Indexed as

MastectomyNK-1 receptor antagonistpost-operative nausea and vomitingthyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID31000893
PMCPMC6460978
OpenAlexW2935577179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.