Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31000794›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Drug prioritization using the semantic properties of a knowledge graph.

Tareq B Malas, Wytze J Vlietstra, Roman Kudrin, Sergey Starikov, Mohammed Charrout, Marco Roos, Dorien J M Peters, Jan A Kors, Rein Vos, Peter A C 't Hoen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Survey on Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Biomedicine and Healthcare.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A semantic web technology index.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Drug repositioning: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tareq B MalasDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wytze J VlietstraDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-8563
Roman KudrinFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, 119234, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey StarikovFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, 119234, Moscow, Russia.
Mohammed CharroutDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marco RoosDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-772X
Dorien J M PetersDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan A KorsDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rein VosDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter A C 't HoenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Erik M van MulligenDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-9386
Kristina M HettneDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. k.m.hettne.2@umail.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-7560
Erasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLLomonosov Moscow State University · RULeiden University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compounds that are candidates for drug repurposing can be ranked by leveraging knowledge available in the biomedical literature and databases. This knowledge, spread across a variety of sources, can be integrated within a knowledge graph, which thereby comprehensively describes known relationships between biomedical concepts, such as drugs, diseases, genes, etc. Our work uses the semantic information between drug and disease concepts as features, which are extracted from an existing knowledge graph that integrates 200 different biological knowledge sources. RepoDB, a standard drug repurposing database which describes drug-disease combinations that were approved or that failed in clinical trials, is used to train a random forest classifier. The 10-times repeated 10-fold cross-validation performance of the classifier achieves a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 92.2%. We apply the classifier to prioritize 21 preclinical drug repurposing candidates that have been suggested for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD). Mozavaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist is predicted to be the drug most likely to be approved after a clinical trial, and belongs to the same drug class as tolvaptan, the only treatment for ADPKD that is currently approved. We conclude that semantic properties of concepts in a knowledge graph can be exploited to prioritize drug repurposing candidates for testing in clinical trials.

Indexed as

SemanticsBenzazepinesClinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualDrug RepositioningHumansInformation DisseminationKnowledgePattern Recognition, AutomatedPolycystic Kidney, Autosomal DominantBenzazepinesmozavaptan

Identifiers

PMID31000794
PMCPMC6472420
OpenAlexW2939519112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.