Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31000782›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

The effects of childhood maltreatment on epigenetic regulation of stress-response associated genes: an intergenerational approach.

Laura Ramo-Fernández, Christina Boeck, Alexandra M Koenig, Katharina Schury, Elisabeth B Binder, Harald Gündel, Jöerg M Fegert, Alexander Karabatsiakis, Iris-Tatjana Kolassa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The relationship between childhood trauma, rs1360780 genotypes,European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura Ramo-FernándezDepartment of Clinical & Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, Ulm, 89081, Germany. laura.ramo.fernandez@gmail.com.
Christina BoeckDepartment of Clinical & Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, Ulm, 89081, Germany.
Alexandra M KoenigDepartment of Clinical & Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, Ulm, 89081, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-0794
Katharina SchuryDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Elisabeth B BinderDepartment of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, 80804, Germany.
Harald GündelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Jöerg M FegertDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Alexander KarabatsiakisDepartment of Clinical & Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, Ulm, 89081, Germany.
Iris-Tatjana KolassaDepartment of Clinical & Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, Ulm, 89081, Germany. Iris.Kolassa@uni-ulm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While biological alterations associated with childhood maltreatment (CM) have been found in affected individuals, it remains unknown to what degree these alterations are biologically transmitted to the next generation. We investigated intergenerational effects of maternal CM on DNA methylation and gene expression in N = 113 mother-infant dyads shortly after parturition, additionally accounting for the role of the FKBP5 rs1360780 genotype. Using mass array spectrometry, we assessed the DNA methylation of selected stress-response-associated genes (FK506 binding protein 51 [FKBP5], glucocorticoid receptor [NR3C1], corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 [CRHR1]) in isolated immune cells from maternal blood and neonatal umbilical cord blood. In mothers, CM was associated with decreased levels of DNA methylation of FKBP5 and CRHR1 and increased NR3C1 methylation, but not with changes in gene expression profiles. Rs1360780 moderated the FKBP5 epigenetic CM-associated regulation profiles in a gene × environment interaction. In newborns, we found no evidence for any intergenerational transmission of CM-related methylation profiles for any of the investigated epigenetic sites. These findings support the hypothesis of a long-lasting impact of CM on the biological epigenetic regulation of stress-response mediators and suggest for the first time that these specific epigenetic patterns might not be directly transmitted to the next generation.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdultAdverse Childhood ExperiencesCells, CulturedChild AbuseCRF Receptor, Type 1DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene-Environment InteractionGene Transfer, HorizontalHumansImmunity, CellularInfant, NewbornMaleMother-Child RelationsCRF Receptor, Type 1NR3C1 protein, humanReceptors, Corticotropin-Releasing HormoneReceptors, GlucocorticoidTacrolimus Binding Protein 5Tacrolimus Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31000782
PMCPMC7052131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.