ArticleJournal of biomechanics2019
A case study on implantation strategies to mitigate coronary obstruction in a patient receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The application of 3D printing in preoperative planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Pooled it
- Evolving capabilities of computed tomography imaging for transcatheter valvular heart interventions - new opportunities for precision medicine.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- In Vitro Assessment of Coronary Perfusion after Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in a High-Risk Patient-Specific Experimental Model.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Imaging of common coronary artery anomalies and imaging features important for clinical decision-making.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Sensitivity of Left Atrial Flow Dynamics to Echocardiographic and Computed Tomography Data.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Differential Impact of Blood Pressure Control Targets on Epicardial Coronary Flow After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2024Article
- A Systematic Analysis of Additive Manufacturing Techniques in the Bioengineering of In Vitro Cardiovascular Models.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- Coronary Perfusion After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Small Aortic Root: In Vitro Experimental Assessment.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2023Article
- Flow Dynamics in Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery in Children: Importance of the Intramural Segment.Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022Article
- Simple 2-dimensional anatomic model to predict the risk of coronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Article
- Utility of Three-Dimensional (3D) Modeling for Planning Structural Heart Interventions (with an Emphasis on Valvular Heart Disease).Current cardiology reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary obstruction is a life threatening complication during and post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The objective of this preliminary work is to investigate the mechanisms underlying coronary obstruction in a patient after TAVR, in whom coronary obstruction was confirmed in addition to highlighting the importance of pre-procedural planning. The aortic root of an 80-year old male patient with coronary obstruction during TAVR-where a 29 mm SAPIEN 3 was deployed-was segmented from Computed Tomography scans and 3D-printed with compliant material. Flow and pressure data were acquired in this 3D-printed model in-vitro using a pulse duplicator under physiological conditions for the cases: a 29 mm SAPIEN 3, a 26 mm SAPIEN 3 expanded with a 29 mm balloon, and a 31 mm Medtronic-CoreValve deployed annularly, supra and sub-annularly respectively. Only the CoreValve in sub-annular axial position and the 29 mm SAPIEN 3 yielded pressure gradients (PG) lower than 10 mmHg (6.76 ± 0.52 and 5.72 ± 0.13 mmHg respectively) while the 26 mm SAPIEN 3, CoreValve in normal and supra-annular positions yielded higher PGs (15.5 ± 0.48, 12.2 ± 0.15 and 10.8 ± 0.24 mmHg respectively). 29 mm SAPIEN 3 implantation yielded an FFR value of 45.7 ± 0.6%. However, 31 mm CoreValve in any of the three different annular positions yielded FFR values going from 89.6 ± 1.1% in supra-annular position to 98.3 ± 1.1% in sub-annular position. Implantation with a 26 mm SAPIEN 3 expanded with a 29 mm balloon also yielded an FFR of 92.1 ± 1.2%. Coronary obstruction in this patient could have been prevented through usage of different valve types and/or through usage of a different combination of valve size-balloon sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.