Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30999936›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2019

Costs of implementing and sustaining enhanced collaborative care programs involving community partners.

Theresa J Hoeft, Heather Wilcox, Ladson Hinton, Jürgen Unützer

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theresa J HoeftDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA. thoeft@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-1945
Heather WilcoxDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA.
Ladson HintonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Jürgen UnützerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaborative care is an evidence-based program for treating depression in primary care. We sought to expand this model by recruiting clinics interested in incorporating community partners (i.e., community-based organizations (CBO) and/or family members) in the care team. Seven sites implemented evidence-based collaborative care programs with community partners while collecting information on costs of implementing and sustaining programs.

methodsSites retrospectively collected data on planning and implementation costs with technical assistance from study researchers. Sites also prospectively collected cost of care activities over a 1-month period once the program was implemented to determine resources needed to sustain programs. Personnel salary costs were adjusted, adding 30% for benefits and 30% for administrative overhead.

resultsThe programs implemented varied considerably in staffing, involvement of care partners, and allocation of costs. Total planning and implementation costs varied from $39,280 to $60,575. The largest implementation cost category involved workflow development and ranged from $16,325 to $31,375 with the highest costs in this category attributed to the most successful implementation among clinic-CBO programs. Following implementation, cost per patient over the 1-month period ranged from $154 to $544. Ongoing strategic decision-making and administrative costs, which were included in cost of care, ranged from $284 to $2328 for the month.

conclusionsSites implemented collaborative care through differing partnerships, staffing, and related costs. Costs to implement and sustain programs developed in partnership are often not collected but are crucial to understanding financial aspects of developing sustainable partnerships. Assessing such costs is feasible and can inform future partnership efforts.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity NetworksContinuity of Patient CareDepressionFamilyFemaleHealth PlanningHumansImplementation ScienceMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareProgram DevelopmentAdaptationCollaborative care implementationCommunity partnersDepressionFamilyOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID30999936
PMCPMC6471861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.