Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30999929›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2019

Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Peter C Taylor, Didier Saurigny, Jiri Vencovsky, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Tadashi Nakamura, Galina Matsievskaia, Barbara Hunt, Thomas Wagner, Bernard Souberbielle, NEXUS Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02379091 (A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Dose Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of Namilumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02379091 phase2completednot on this map

A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Dose Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of Namilumab (20 mg, 80 mg and 150 mg) in Combination With Methotrexate (MTX) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTakedaRan2014 to 2016Enrolled108ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsNamilumab, Placebo, Methotrexate, Folic/folinic acid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies in myeloid leukemias.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2025
    Review
  13. GM-CSFTheranostics · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Crosstalk between CD64EMBO molecular medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Peter C TaylorBotnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. peter.taylor@kennedy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-6167
Didier SaurignyTakeda Development Centre, London, UK.
Jiri VencovskyInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tsutomu TakeuchiDivision of Rheumatology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadashi NakamuraKumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Galina MatsievskaiaClinical Rheumatology Hospital #25, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Barbara HuntStatistics, Takeda International, Deerfield, IL, USA.
Thomas WagnerModeling and Simulation, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bernard SouberbielleTakeda Development Centre, London, UK.
NEXUS Study Group
Keio University · JPNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBTakeda (Switzerland) · CHAge UK · GBDeerfield (United States) · USTakeda (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNamilumab (AMG203), an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR) or anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy (TNF-IR).

methodsSubcutaneous namilumab (20, 80, or 150 mg) or placebo was administered at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 10 in patients on stable background methotrexate therapy who were with MTX-IR or TNF-IR. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein version (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 comparing each of the three doses of namilumab to placebo. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events (AEs) and pulmonary parameters. Results were analysed using the per-protocol population.

resultsOne hundred eight patients from Europe and Japan (48.4 ± 12.02 years old; 77.8% female; mean DAS28-CRP 5.60-5.79; rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibodies + 75%) were randomized to placebo or namilumab 20, 80, or 150 mg (n = 27, 28, 25, and 28, respectively). Ninety-two were MTX-IR; 16 were TNF-IR. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in DAS28-CRP (p = 0.005) was seen for namilumab 150 mg versus placebo and separation was seen as early as week 2 for namilumab 150 mg (p < 0.05), with higher ACR50 and response rates versus placebo at week 12. A dose-response effect was observed across the DAS28-CRP endpoint with separation versus placebo evident from week 2. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were nasopharyngitis (18.5%, 17.9%, 4.0%, 14.3%), dyspnoea (0.0%, 3.6%, 8.0%, 10.7%), bronchitis (7.4%, 3.6%, 4.0%, 3.6%), and headache (3.7%, 3.6%, 12.0%, 0.0%) for placebo and 20, 80, or 150 mg of namilumab, respectively. No serious infections were observed. One serious AE (myocardial infarction) was observed with 150 mg of namilumab. There was no apparent dose relationship for AEs. A biomarker-based disease activity score showed a dose-dependent decrease at week 12.

conclusionsThis phase II study demonstrates the benefit of inhibiting macrophage activity targeting the GM-CSF for RA. The study met its primary endpoint with a clear dose-response effect. An acceptable tolerability profile was demonstrated over the 12-week study.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NEXUS; NCT02379091 , submitted November 28, 2014.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMethotrexatenamilumabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaGM-CSFNamilumabRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30999929
PMCPMC6471864
OpenAlexW2937167388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.