Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2019
Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial.
Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02379091 (A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Dose Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of Namilumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Dose Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of Namilumab (20 mg, 80 mg and 150 mg) in Combination With Methotrexate (MTX) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of sequential biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and predictive factors.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of namilumab for the treatment of chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis (RESOLVE-Lung): a randomised, double-blinded, multicentre, phase 2 study.The European respiratory journal · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Anti-GM-CSF otilimab versus tofacitinib or placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional or biologic DMARDs: two phase 3 randomised trials (contRAst 1 and contRAst 2).Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2023Trial
- Anti-GM-CSF otilimab versus sarilumab or placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to targeted therapies: a phase III randomised trial (contRAst 3).Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2023Trial
- Pathogenic GM-CSF drives functional diversification of inflammatory macrophages in autoimmune arthritis.Science advances · 2026Article
- Operationalizing Chronic Inflammation: An Endotype-to-Care Framework for Precision and Equity.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Targeting GM-CSF in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advances in Cytokine-Directed Immunotherapy and Clinical Implications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Promising Molecular Therapeutic Targets for Drug Development in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Targeting rheumatoid arthritis: a molecular perspective on biologic therapies and clinical progress.Journal of biological engineering · 2025Review
- Tissue macrophages: origin, heterogenity, biological functions, diseases and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies in myeloid leukemias.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2025Review
- GM-CSFTheranostics · 2025Review
- Targeting cytokine networks in neuroinflammatory diseases.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024Review
- Crosstalk between CD64EMBO molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Emerging Therapeutic Options for Refractory Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: The Evidence and Proposed Mechanisms of Action.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Current Pharmacological Therapies for the Management of Spondyloarthritis: Special Considerations in Older Patients.Drugs & aging · 2023Review
- Review
- Updates on ankylosing spondylitis: pathogenesis and therapeutic agents.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2023Review
- Drug repurposing for COVID-19: current evidence from randomized controlled adaptive platform trials and living systematic reviews.British medical bulletin · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNamilumab (AMG203), an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR) or anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy (TNF-IR).
methodsSubcutaneous namilumab (20, 80, or 150 mg) or placebo was administered at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 10 in patients on stable background methotrexate therapy who were with MTX-IR or TNF-IR. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein version (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 comparing each of the three doses of namilumab to placebo. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events (AEs) and pulmonary parameters. Results were analysed using the per-protocol population.
resultsOne hundred eight patients from Europe and Japan (48.4 ± 12.02 years old; 77.8% female; mean DAS28-CRP 5.60-5.79; rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibodies + 75%) were randomized to placebo or namilumab 20, 80, or 150 mg (n = 27, 28, 25, and 28, respectively). Ninety-two were MTX-IR; 16 were TNF-IR. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in DAS28-CRP (p = 0.005) was seen for namilumab 150 mg versus placebo and separation was seen as early as week 2 for namilumab 150 mg (p < 0.05), with higher ACR50 and response rates versus placebo at week 12. A dose-response effect was observed across the DAS28-CRP endpoint with separation versus placebo evident from week 2. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were nasopharyngitis (18.5%, 17.9%, 4.0%, 14.3%), dyspnoea (0.0%, 3.6%, 8.0%, 10.7%), bronchitis (7.4%, 3.6%, 4.0%, 3.6%), and headache (3.7%, 3.6%, 12.0%, 0.0%) for placebo and 20, 80, or 150 mg of namilumab, respectively. No serious infections were observed. One serious AE (myocardial infarction) was observed with 150 mg of namilumab. There was no apparent dose relationship for AEs. A biomarker-based disease activity score showed a dose-dependent decrease at week 12.
conclusionsThis phase II study demonstrates the benefit of inhibiting macrophage activity targeting the GM-CSF for RA. The study met its primary endpoint with a clear dose-response effect. An acceptable tolerability profile was demonstrated over the 12-week study.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NEXUS; NCT02379091 , submitted November 28, 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.