Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30999901›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019

Effect of chemotherapy on cancer stem cells and tumor-associated macrophages in a prospective study of preoperative chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.

Keith M Skubitz, Jon D Wilson, Edward Y Cheng, Bruce R Lindgren, Kristin L M Boylan, Amy P N Skubitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Correlation betweenQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keith M SkubitzDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Box 286 University Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. skubi001@umn.edu.
Jon D WilsonMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Edward Y ChengMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bruce R LindgrenMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kristin L M BoylanMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Amy P N SkubitzMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer stem cells (CSC) may respond to chemotherapy differently from other tumor cells.

methodsThis study examined the expression of the putative cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD44, and CD133; the angiogenesis marker CD31; and the macrophage marker CD68 in soft tissue sarcomas (STS) before and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide in 31 patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcoma in a prospective clinical trial.

resultsNone of the markers clearly identified CSCs in STS samples. Macrophages represented a prominent component in viable tumor areas in pre-treatment STS biopsies, ranging from < 5 to > 50%. Furthermore, macrophages expressed CD44 and ALDH1. Macrophage density correlated with baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Pre-chemotherapy CD68 staining correlated positively with the baseline SUVmax, and negatively with the percent of viable tumor cells in post-chemotherapy resection samples. In particular, cases with more CD68-positive cells at biopsy had fewer viable tumor cells at resection, suggesting a better response to chemotherapy.

conclusionsIn conclusion, ALDH1, CD44, and CD133 are not likely to be useful markers of CSCs in STS. However, our observation of infiltrating macrophages in STS specimens indicates that these immune cells may contribute significantly to STS biology and response to chemotherapy, and could provide a potential target of therapy. Future studies should investigate macrophage contribution to STS pathophysiology by cytokine signaling.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMacrophagesNeoplastic Stem CellsNeovascularization, PathologicProspective StudiesSarcomaTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCancer stem cellChemotherapyMacrophagePETPositron emission tomographySarcoma

Identifiers

PMID30999901
PMCPMC6471853
OpenAlexW2946926713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.