Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30999899›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2019

Inequalities in health-related quality of life according to age, gender, educational level, social class, body mass index and chronic diseases using the Spanish value set for Euroquol 5D-5L questionnaire.

Arantzazu Arrospide, Mónica Machón, Juan M Ramos-Goñi, Oliver Ibarrondo, Javier Mar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. The impact of health literacy on health-related quality of life among individuals with physical disabilities: a path analysis based on the integrated model of health literacy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arantzazu ArrospideUnidad de Investigación AP-OSIs Gipuzkoa, Hospital Alto Deba, Avda Navarra 16, Arrasate-Mondragón, 20500, Gipuzkoa, Spain. arantzazu.arrospideelgarresta@osakidetza.eus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3537-6588
Mónica MachónRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Spain.
Juan M Ramos-GoñiRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Spain.
Oliver IbarrondoUnidad de Investigación AP-OSIs Gipuzkoa, Hospital Alto Deba, Avda Navarra 16, Arrasate-Mondragón, 20500, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
Javier MarUnidad de Investigación AP-OSIs Gipuzkoa, Hospital Alto Deba, Avda Navarra 16, Arrasate-Mondragón, 20500, Gipuzkoa, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing health inequalities on the basis of social factors has been a key driver in the development of Public Health policies. Health-related quality of life is a global indicator useful to assess health inequalities within a society. The objective of this study was to identify inequalities on health by analysing the interactive effects of gender, age, educational level, social class, body mass index and chronic diseases on health-related quality of life in a Spanish population sample.

methodsWe used data from the Spanish National Health Survey 2011-2012. Health-related quality of life was measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument applying the Spanish value set. Probability of being in perfect health was ascertained by logistic regression models including gender, age, educational level, body mass index and social class and the corresponding terms of interaction. A two-part model combining logistic regression analysis and generalized linear models was applied to calculate the adjusted utility loss associated with chronic conditions (disutility values).

resultsThe sample used for analysis contained 18,450 individuals. The mean age was 50 years, 51.3% were women, 55% were overweight or obese and 46.7% had low social status. The mean utility was 0.94 in men and 0.89 in women. Elderly women, obese people, those of low social class and those with chronic conditions had significant lower utility values. Within the regression analysis, interaction assessment revealed that the detrimental effect of obesity disappeared in higher social classes. Utility values for all chronic conditions considered were lower in women than in men and were on a gradient within social class, the lowest for individuals declaring stroke. The greatest decrease on health-related quality of life was determined by declaration of stroke (17.6%) or mental diseases (18.6%).

conclusionsThe interactive effects of gender, age, educational level, social class, body mass index and chronic diseases on health-related quality of life in the Spanish population revealed important inequalities in health. Social class acted as a modulator of the stigma associated with obesity. Chronic conditions producing loss of autonomy had the greatest impact on reduction of health-related quality of life. This is the first study using the Spanish EQ-5D-5L value set to estimate utilities.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesQuality of LifeSocial ClassAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObesityBody mass indexChronic conditionsEQ-5D-5LHealth-related quality of lifeSocial class

Identifiers

PMID30999899
PMCPMC6472013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.