ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
A Dynamic Bayesian Network model for the simulation of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis progression.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic models for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Using blood data for the differential diagnosis and prognosis of motor neuron diseases: a new dataset for machine learning applications.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Retrospective Study of the Physiological and Molecular Features of the S-FUS (1-359) Mouse Transgenic Model with an ALS-like Phenotype: Lifespan, Body Weight Dynamics, Movement Disorders, and Dysregulation of the Dopaminergic System.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Article
- An efficient dimensionality reduction framework using metaheuristic optimization with deep learning models for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Phosphatemia is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- The Potential of Disease Progression Modeling to Advance Clinical Development and Decision Making.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Dynamic effects of prognostic factors and individual survival prediction for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Triclustering-based classification of longitudinal data for prognostic prediction: targeting relevant clinical endpoints in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Multimodal in vivo staging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using artificial intelligence.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022Article
- Applied Bayesian Approaches for Research in Motor Neuron Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Manifold learning for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional loss assessment : Development and validation of a prognosis model.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- The 2017 Network Tools and Applications in Biology (NETTAB) workshop: aims, topics and outcomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disease progressively affecting upper and lower motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord. Mean life expectancy is three to five years, with paralysis of muscles, respiratory failure and loss of vital functions being the common causes of death. Clinical manifestations of ALS are heterogeneous due to the mix of anatomic regions involvement and the variability in disease course; consequently, diagnosis and prognosis at the level of individual patient is really challenging. Prediction of ALS progression and stratification of patients into meaningful subgroups have been long-standing interests to clinical practice, research and drug development.
methodsWe developed a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) model on more than 4500 ALS patients included in the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials Database (PRO-ACT), in order to detect probabilistic relationships among clinical variables and identify risk factors related to survival and loss of vital functions. Furthermore, the DBN was used to simulate the temporal evolution of an ALS cohort predicting survival and the time to impairment of vital functions (communication, swallowing, gait and respiration). A first attempt to stratify patients by risk factors and simulate the progression of ALS subgroups was also implemented.
resultsThe DBN model provided the prediction of ALS most probable trajectories over time in terms of important clinical outcomes, including survival and loss of autonomy in functional domains. Furthermore, it allowed the identification of biomarkers related to patients' clinical status as well as vital functions, and unrevealed their probabilistic relationships. For instance, DBN found that bicarbonate and calcium levels influence survival time; moreover, the model evidenced dependencies over time among phosphorus level, movement impairment and creatinine. Finally, our model provided a tool to stratify patients into subgroups of different prognosis studying the effect of specific variables, or combinations of them, on either survival time or time to loss of autonomy in specific functional domains.
conclusionsThe analysis of the risk factors and the simulation allowed by our DBN model might enable better support for ALS prognosis as well as a deeper insight into disease manifestations, in a context of a personalized medicine approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.