Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30999702›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Natural Products in Alzheimer's Disease Therapy: Would Old Therapeutic Approaches Fix the Broken Promise of Modern Medicines?

Solomon Habtemariam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. RoastedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. RoastedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification of Catechins' Binding Sites in Monomeric AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Antiviral Activity ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Solomon HabtemariamPharmacognosy Research Laboratories & Herbal Analysis Services UK, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham-Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK. s.habtemariam@herbalanalysis.co.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive progress in understanding the pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) over the last 50 years, clinical trials based on the amyloid-beta (Aβ) hypothesis have kept failing in late stage human trials. As a result, just four old drugs of limited clinical outcomes and numerous side effects are currently used for AD therapy. This article assesses the common pharmacological targets and therapeutic principles for current and future drugs. It also underlines the merits of natural products acting through a polytherapeutic approach over a monotherapy option of AD therapy. Multi-targeting approaches through general antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms coupled with specific receptor and/or enzyme-mediated effects in neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, and other rational perspectives of novel drug discovery are emphasized.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsBiological ProductsDrug DiscoveryNeuroprotective AgentsHumansAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsBiological ProductsNeuroprotective AgentsacetylcholinesteraseAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid betaanti-inflammatoryantioxidantcholinergictau protein

Identifiers

PMID30999702
PMCPMC6514598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.