Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30999612›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Who Should Play a Key Role in Preventing Common Mental Disorders that Affect Employees in the Workplace? Results of a Survey with Occupational Health Physicians, Primary Care Physicians, Psychotherapists, and Human Resource Managers.

Martina Michaelis, Elisabeth Maria Balint, Florian Junne, Stephan Zipfel, Harald Gündel, Rahna Lange, Monika A Rieger, Eva Rothermund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Collaboration between occupational health services and other health care: a scoping review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martina MichaelisInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. martina.michaelis@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Elisabeth Maria BalintUlm University Medical Center, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, 89070 Ulm, Germany. elisabeth.balint@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Florian JunneDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. florian.junne@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Stephan ZipfelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. stephan.zipfel@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Harald GündelUlm University Medical Center, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, 89070 Ulm, Germany. harald.guendel@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Rahna LangeInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. rahna.lange@gmail.com.
Monika A RiegerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. monika.rieger@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-3663
Eva RothermundUlm University Medical Center, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, 89070 Ulm, Germany. eva.rothermund@uniklinik-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8295-2632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising burden of common mental disorders (CMDs) in employees requires strategies for prevention. No systematic data exist about how those involved perceive their roles, responsibilities, and interactions with other professional groups. Therefore, we performed a multi-professional standardized survey with health professionals in Germany. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 133 occupational health physicians (OHPs), 136 primary care physicians (PCPs), 186 psychotherapists (PTs), and 172 human resource managers (HRMs). Inter alia, they were asked which health professionals working in the company health service and in the outpatient care or in the sector of statutory insurance agents should play a key role in the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of CMDs in employees. The McNemar test was used in order to compare the attributed roles among the professionals involved. With regard to CMDs, all the professional groups involved in this study declared OHPs as the most relevant pillar in the field of prevention. In primary prevention, HRMs regarded themselves, OHPs, and health insurance agents as equally relevant in terms of prevention. PTs indicated an important role for employee representatives in this field. In secondary prevention, PCPs were regarded as important as OHPs. HRMs indicated themselves as equally important as OHPs and PCPs. In tertiary prevention, only OHPs identified themselves as main protagonists. The other groups marked a variety of several professions. There is a common acceptance from the parties involved that might help the first steps be taken toward overcoming barriers, e.g., by developing a common framework for quality-assured intersectional cooperation in the field of CMD prevention in employees.

Indexed as

Occupational Health PhysiciansPhysicians, Primary CareProfessional RolePsychotherapyWorkplaceFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMental DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforcecommitment to preventioncommon mental disordersemployeeshuman resource managersoccupational health physiciansprimary care physicianspsychotherapistssurvey

Identifiers

PMID30999612
PMCPMC6517970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.