Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30998714›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

School policies, built environment and practices for non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention and control in schools of Delhi, India.

Shalini Bassi, Vinay K Gupta, MinHae Park, Gaurang P Nazar, Tina Rawal, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Kanwal Preet Kochhar, Monika Arora

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adolescents' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards NCDs: the Impact of a Novel Preventive School-Based Approach.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shalini BassiHealth Promotion Division, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Gurgaon, Haryana, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6348-3335
Vinay K GuptaHealth Promotion Division, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
MinHae ParkDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2563-4910
Gaurang P NazarHealth Promotion Division, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Tina RawalHealth Promotion Division, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Soumyadeep BhaumikHealth Promotion Division, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Kanwal Preet KochharDepartment of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Monika AroraHealth Promotion Division, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Gurgaon, Haryana, India.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT084754/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess school policies, built environment and practices for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in schools of Delhi, India.

methodsSchool built environments and policies were assessed using a structured observation checklist in 10 private and 9 government schools which were randomly selected from all 184 co-educational schools with primary to senior secondary level education in Delhi, India. A self-administered questionnaire was also completed by teachers from each school (n = 19) to capture information specific to school policies. Surveys were also conducted with parent of students in class II (aged 6-7 years; n = 574) and student in class XI (aged 15-16 years, n = 755) to understand school practices.

resultsThe majority of government (88.9%; n = 8) and private (80%; n = 8) schools reported having comprehensive school health policy. In terms of specific health behaviours, policies related to diet and nutrition in government schools were mostly restricted to primary levels with provision of the mid-day meal programme. All schools had two physical education periods per week of about 45-50 minutes. Most schools were compliant with tobacco-free school guidelines (n = 15 out of 19) and had alcohol control policies (n = 13 out of 19). Parent and student reports of practices indicated that school policies were not consistently implemented.

conclusionMost schools in Delhi have policies that address health behaviours in students, but there was considerable variation in the types and number of policies and school environments. Government schools are more likely to have policies in place than private schools. Further work is needed to evaluate how these policies are implemented and to assess their impact on health outcomes.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentHealth BehaviorNutrition PolicySchoolsAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleNoncommunicable Diseases

Identifiers

PMID30998714
PMCPMC6472740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.