Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30998705›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Multi-trait multi-environment models in the genetic selection of segregating soybean progeny.

Leonardo Volpato, Rodrigo Silva Alves, Paulo Eduardo Teodoro, Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende, Moysés Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento, Willian Hytalo Ludke, Felipe Lopes da Silva, Aluízio Borém

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genomic selection for genotype performance and stability using information on multiple traits and multiple environments.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  5. Genetic Variation in Flowering Traits of TasmanianPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leonardo VolpatoFederal University of Viçosa-Department of Plant Science, University Campus, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1119-0615
Rodrigo Silva AlvesFederal University of Viçosa-Department of General Biology, University Campus, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Paulo Eduardo TeodoroFederal University of Mato Grosso do Sul-Department of Plant Science, University Campus, Chapadão do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Marcos Deon Vilela de ResendeFederal University of Viçosa-Department of Statistics, University Campus, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Moysés NascimentoFederal University of Viçosa-Department of Statistics, University Campus, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Campana NascimentoFederal University of Viçosa-Department of Statistics, University Campus, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Willian Hytalo LudkeFederal University of Viçosa-Department of Plant Science, University Campus, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Felipe Lopes da SilvaFederal University of Viçosa-Department of Plant Science, University Campus, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Aluízio BorémFederal University of Viçosa-Department of Plant Science, University Campus, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, single-trait best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) is the standard method for genetic selection in soybean. However, when genetic selection is performed based on two or more genetically correlated traits and these are analyzed individually, selection bias may arise. Under these conditions, considering the correlation structure between the evaluated traits may provide more-accurate genetic estimates for the evaluated parameters, even under environmental influences. The present study was thus developed to examine the efficiency and applicability of multi-trait multi-environment (MTME) models by the residual maximum likelihood (REML/BLUP) and Bayesian approaches in the genetic selection of segregating soybean progeny. The study involved data pertaining to 203 soybean F2:4 progeny assessed in two environments for the following traits: number of days to maturity (DM), 100-seed weight (SW), and average seed yield per plot (SY). Variance components and genetic and non-genetic parameters were estimated via the REML/BLUP and Bayesian methods. The variance components estimated and the breeding values and genetic gains predicted with selection through the Bayesian procedure were similar to those obtained by REML/BLUP. The frequentist and Bayesian MTME models provided higher estimates of broad-sense heritability per plot (or heritability of total effects of progeny; [Formula: see text]) and mean accuracy of progeny than their respective single-trait versions. Bayesian analysis provided the credibility intervals for the estimates of [Formula: see text]. Therefore, MTME led to greater predicted gains from selection. On this basis, this procedure can be efficiently applied in the genetic selection of segregating soybean progeny.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenotypeModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceSelection, GeneticGlycine max

Identifiers

PMID30998705
PMCPMC6472761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.