Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30998223›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada.

Cynthia Weijs, Jason Coe, Serge Desmarais, Shannon Majowicz, Andria Jones-Bitton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social media in cardiovascular medicine: a contemporary review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2020
    Review
  8. A New Application of Social Impact in Social Media for Overcoming Fake News in Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cynthia WeijsDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-2155
Jason CoeDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0811-5051
Serge DesmaraisDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3485-3303
Shannon MajowiczFaculty of Applied Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0006-8369
Andria Jones-BittonDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4933-3688

Funding

CIHR 599547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is considerable discussion of risks to health professionals' reputations and employment from personal social media use, though its impacts on professional credibility and the health professional-client relationship are unknown.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to test the extent to which workday comments posted to health professionals' personal Facebook profiles influence their credibility and affect the professional-client relationship.

methodsIn a controlled field study, participants (members of the public) reviewed randomly assigned mock Facebook profiles of health professionals. The 2×2×2 factorial design of mock profiles included gender (female/male), health profession (physician/veterinarian), and workday comment type (evident frustration/ambiguous). Participants then rated the profile owner's credibility on a visual analog scale. An analysis of variance test compared ratings. Mediation analyses tested the importance of credibility ratings on participants' willingness to become a client of the mock health professional.

resultsParticipants (N=357) rated health professionals whose personal Facebook profile showed a comment with evident frustration rather than an ambiguous workday comment as less credible (P<.001; mean difference 11.18 [SE 1.28]; 95% CI 8.66 to 13.70). Furthermore, participants indicated they were less likely to become clients of the former when they considered credibility (standardized beta=.69; P<.001). Credibility explained 86% of the variation in the relationship between the type of workday comment and the participant's willingness to become a client of the health professional.

conclusionsThis study provides the first evidence of the impact of health professionals' personal online disclosures on credibility and the health relationship. Public perceptions about professionalism and credibility are integral to developing the evidence base for e-professionalism guidelines and encouraging best practices in social media use.

Indexed as

ProfessionalismAdultCanadaFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSocial Mediamedical educationprofessionalismprofessional-patient relationssocial mediatrust

Identifiers

PMID30998223
PMCPMC6495291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.