ArticlePsychological methods2019
An exponential effect persistence model for intensive longitudinal data.
Article in Psychological methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling intraindividual variability in affect (MIVA): Formalized theoretical approach, computational model, and parameter recovery study.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We develop an effect persistence model for intensive longitudinal data under a general assumption of an exponential loss of association between exposure and outcome over time. The working model proposed may be useful for understanding the complexity of phenomena for which subjects can be repeatedly exposed to an intervention or a naturally occurring event, while, the effect of any one exposure is expected to diminish over time. Under the main assumption, we specify a semilinear model with extensions to generalized linear models. These methods are motivated by, and applied to, data from a study of adolescent exposure to prosmoking advertisement in which the impact of prosmoking media exposure on young adults' susceptibility to smoking is assessed along with the decay of the effect over time. We investigate the performance of the proposed method when the model assumptions are correctly specified or not. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.