Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997937›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2019

Bacterial community structure and function distinguish gut sites in captive red-shanked doucs (Pygathrix nemaeus).

Jonathan B Clayton, Robin R Shields-Cutler, Susan L Hoops, Gabriel A Al-Ghalith, John C M Sha, Timothy J Johnson, Dan Knights

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbial community in proboscis monkeys (Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fecal bacterial communities of wild black capuchin monkeys (Current research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Jonathan B ClaytonDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Robin R Shields-CutlerBiotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
Susan L HoopsBiotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
Gabriel A Al-GhalithBioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
John C M ShaSchool of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Timothy J JohnsonPrimate Microbiome Project, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Dan KnightsDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · USBiotechnology Institute · USSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Minnesota, Waseca · US

Funding

Training in PharmacoNeuroImmune Substance Abuse ResearchT32DA007097 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MOLITOR, THOMAS WILLIAM · 1985 to 2021
$13.1M
Margot Marsh Biodiversity FoundationNIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian order primates contains wide species diversity. Members of the subfamily Colobinae are unique amongst extant primates in that their gastrointestinal systems more closely resemble those of ruminants than other members of the primate order. In the growing literature surrounding nonhuman primate microbiomes, analysis of microbial communities has been limited to the hindgut, since few studies have captured data on other gut sites, including the foregut of colobine primates. In this study, we used the red-shanked douc (Pygathrix nemaeus) as a model for colobine primates to study the relationship between gastrointestinal bacterial community structure and gut site within and between subjects. We analyzed fecal and pregastric stomach content samples, representative of the hindgut and foregut respectively, using 16S recombinant DNA (rDNA) sequencing and identified microbiota using closed-reference operational taxonomic unit (OTU) picking against the GreenGenes database. Our results show divergent bacterial communities clearly distinguish the foregut and hindgut microbiomes. We found higher bacterial biodiversity and a higher Firmicutes:Bacteroides ratio in the hindgut as opposed to the foregut. These gut sites showed strong associations with bacterial function. Specifically, energy metabolism was upregulated in the hindgut, whereas detoxification was increased in the foregut. Our results suggest a red-shanked douc's foregut microbiome is no more concordant with its own hindgut than it is with any other red-shanked douc's hindgut microbiome, thus reinforcing the notion that the bacterial communities of the foregut and hindgut are distinctly unique. OPEN PRACTICES: This article has been awarded Open Materials and Open Data badges. All materials and data are publicly accessible via the IRIS Repository at https://www.iris-database.org/iris/app/home/detail?id=york:934328. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityColobinaeFecesGenome, BacterialIntestinesSequence Analysis, DNAStomachcolobineecologymicrobiomeprimate

Identifiers

PMID30997937
PMCPMC6800578
OpenAlexW2938727982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.