Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997678›Full record

ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2019

Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies: Parents' preferences for psychosocial care.

Frederike H W Dekkers, Attie T J I Go, Luuk Stapersma, Alex J Eggink, Elisabeth M W J Utens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The PreGen Research Program: Implementing Prenatal Genomic Testing in Australia-A Commentary.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frederike H W DekkersDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Unit of Psychosocial Care, Erasmus Medical Center and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0718-0430
Attie T J I GoDivision of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Luuk StapersmaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Unit of Psychosocial Care, Erasmus Medical Center and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alex J EgginkDivision of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth M W J UtensDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Unit of Psychosocial Care, Erasmus Medical Center and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate, from the perspective of women and partners, at what stage of a termination of pregnancy (TOP) for fetal anomalies psychosocial care (PSC) is most meaningful, what topics should be discussed, and who should provide PSC.

methodA cross-sectional retrospective cohort study was conducted with a consecutive series of 76 women and 36 partners, who completed a semi-structured online questionnaire.

resultsOverall, women expressed a greater need for PSC than their partners. Parents expressed a preference for receiving support from a maternal-fetal medicine specialist to help them understand the severity and consequences of the anomalies found and to counsel them in their decision regarding termination. Parents showed a preference for support from mental healthcare providers to help with their emotional responses. Forty-one percent of the women visited a psychosocial professional outside of the hospital after the TOP, indicating a clear need for a well-organised aftercare.

conclusionDifferent disciplines should work together in a complementary way during the diagnosis, decision making, TOP, and aftercare stages. Parents' need for PSC should be discussed at the beginning of the process. During aftercare, attention should be paid to grief counselling, acknowledgement of the lost baby's existence, and possible future pregnancies.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedPatient PreferenceAdultCongenital AbnormalitiesCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleFetusGriefHumansParentsPregnancyPsychotherapyRetrospective StudiesStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Identifiers

PMID30997678
PMCPMC6767557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.