Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997595›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Specialist breast cancer nurses' views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study.

Susanne Cruickshank, Emma Steel, Deborah Fenlon, Jo Armes, Elspeth Banks, Gerald Humphris

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Specialist breast care nurses for support of women with breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A qualitative exploration of fear of progression in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton and heavy ion therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne CruickshankFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland. Susanne.cruickshank@stir.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-4739
Emma SteelFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland.
Deborah FenlonCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Jo ArmesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Elspeth BanksNational Cancer Research Institute, Angel Building 407 St John Street, London, EC1V 4AD, UK.
Gerald HumphrisSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.
University of Stirling · GBNational Cancer Research Institute · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2015NovSP679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in people with breast cancer affects treatment recovery, quality of life, service utilisation and relationships. Our aim was to investigate how specialist breast cancer nurses (SBCN) respond to their patients' fears of cancer recurrence and analyse SBCN's views about embedding a new psychological intervention, the Mini-AFTERc, into their consultations.

methodA mixed methods sequential design was used, informed by normalisation process theory. Phase 1: UK SBCNs were emailed a web-based survey to investigate how breast cancer survivors' FCR is currently identified and managed, and their willingness to utilise the Mini-AFTERc. Phase 2: a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) were interviewed to augment phase 1 responses, and explore views on the importance of addressing FCR, interest in the Mini-AFTERc intervention, its content, skills required and challenges to delivering the intervention.

resultsNinety nurses responded to the survey. When SBCN's were asked to identify the proportion of patients experiencing FCR in their caseload, there was no consensus on the size of the problem or unmet need. They estimated that 20-100% people experience moderate FCR and 10-70% severe FCR. The interviews identified that clinical conversations are focused primarily on giving information about signs and symptoms of recurrence rather than addressing the psychological aspects of fear.

conclusionFindings indicate wide variability in how FCR was identified, assessed and supported by a sample of UK SBCNs. The introduction of a structured intervention into practice was viewed favourably and has implications for nursing and health professional ways of working in all cancer services.

Indexed as

FearPerceptionAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNursesPhobic DisordersPractice Patterns, Nurses'Breast cancerFear of cancer recurrenceMini-AFTERc interventionMixed methodsNormalisation process theoryNurseNurse specialist

Identifiers

PMID30997595
PMCPMC6882748
OpenAlexW2938375162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.