ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2019
Paediatric reference intervals are heterogeneous and differ considerably in the classification of healthy paediatric blood samples.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Respiratory Infections After Nonpharmacological Interventions for COVID-19 in China Have Ended: Using Machine Learning Approaches to Support Pathogen Prediction at Admission.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Article
- Infant Reference Intervals-Steps Towards Improving the Supportive Data for Result Interpretation.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Review
- When Positive is Negative: Health Literacy Barriers to Patient Access to Clinical Laboratory Test Results.The journal of applied laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Epidemiology, risk factors, and applicability of CDC definitions for healthcare-associated bloodstream infections at a level IV neonatal ICU.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Article
- Current State of Pediatric Reference Intervals and the Importance of Correctly Describing the Biochemistry of Child Development: A Review.JAMA pediatrics · 2022Review
- Status of folate in healthy children in Almeria.European journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Capillary blood reference intervals for platelet parameters in healthy full-term neonates in China.BMC pediatrics · 2020Article
- Application of adult reference intervals in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
- Medical Diagnostic Tests: A Review of Test Anatomy, Phases, and Statistical Treatment of Data.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019Review
- Insulin reference intervals in Brazilian adolescents by direct and indirect approaches: validation of a data mining method from laboratory data.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to elude differences in published paediatric reference intervals (RIs) and the implementations hereof in terms of classification of samples. Predicaments associated with transferring RIs published elsewhere are addressed. A local paediatric (aged 0 days to < 18 years) population of platelet count, haemoglobin level and white blood cell count, based on first draw samples from general practitioners was established. PubMed was used to identify studies with transferable RIs. The classification of local samples by the individual RIs was evaluated. Transference was done in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP28-A3C guideline. Validation of transference was done using a quality demand based on biological variance. Twelve studies with a combined 28 RIs were transferred onto the local population, which was derived from 20,597 children. Studies varied considerably in methodology and results. In terms of classification, up to 63% of the samples would change classification from normal to diseased, depending on which RI was applied. When validating the transferred RIs, one RI was implementable in the local population. Conclusion: Published paediatric RIs are heterogeneous, making assessment of transferability problematic and resulting in marked differences in classification of paediatric samples, thereby potentially affecting diagnosis and treatment of children. What is Known: • Reference intervals (RIs) are fundamental for the interpretation of paediatric samples and thus correct diagnosis and treatment of the individual child. • Guidelines for the establishment of adult RIs exist, but there are no specific recommendations for establishing paediatric RIs, which is problematic, and laboratories often implement RIs published elsewhere as a consequence. What is New: • Paediatric RIs published in peer-reviewed scientific journals differ considerably in methodology applied for the establishment of the RI. • The RIs show marked divergence in the classification of local samples from healthy children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30997593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.