Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997581›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2019

Implementing a central composite design for the optimization of solid phase microextraction to establish the urinary volatomic expression: a first approach for breast cancer.

Catarina L Silva, Rosa Perestrelo, Pedro Silva, Helena Tomás, José S Câmara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urinary volatile organic compounds as potential non-invasive markers for childhood obesity.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catarina L SilvaCQM-Centro de Química da Madeira, Universidade da Madeira, Campus Universitário da Penteada, 9020-105, Funchal, Portugal.
Rosa PerestreloCQM-Centro de Química da Madeira, Universidade da Madeira, Campus Universitário da Penteada, 9020-105, Funchal, Portugal.
Pedro SilvaCQM-Centro de Química da Madeira, Universidade da Madeira, Campus Universitário da Penteada, 9020-105, Funchal, Portugal.
Helena TomásCQM-Centro de Química da Madeira, Universidade da Madeira, Campus Universitário da Penteada, 9020-105, Funchal, Portugal.
José S CâmaraCQM-Centro de Química da Madeira, Universidade da Madeira, Campus Universitário da Penteada, 9020-105, Funchal, Portugal. jsc@staff.uma.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-1965-3151
Universidade da Madeira · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer (BC) is positioned as the second among all cancers remaining at the top of women´s diseases worldwide followed by colorectum, lung, cervix, and thyroid cancers. The main drawback of most the screening/diagnostic methods is their low sensitivity/specificity and in some cases the invasive procedure required to obtain the samples.

objectivesOn the present investigation, we report a statistical design was to evaluate by central composite design the influence towards the optimization of the most significant variables of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) procedure for the isolation of volatile organic metabolites (VOMs) from urine of BC patients (N = 31) and healthy individuals (CTL; N = 40). The establishment of the urinary volatomic composition, through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis, can boost the identification of volatile organic metabolites (VOMs) potential BC biomarkers useful to be used together or to complement the current BC diagnostics tools. Better early detection methods are needed to improve the outcomes of patients with BC.

methodsSeveral combinations of experiments were considered with a central composite design (CCD) of response surface methodology (RSM) for the urinary volatomic pattern. Three-level three-factor CCD was employed assessing the most important extraction-influencing variables-fiber coating, NaCl amount, extraction time and temperature. The optimal conditions were achieved using a carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane fiber with 15% (w/v) NaCl during 75 min at 50 °C.

resultsA total of ten VOMs belonging to sulfur compounds, terpenoids and carbonyl compounds presented the highest contribution towards discrimination of BC patients from CTL (variable importance in projection (VIP) > 1, p < 0.05). The discrimination efficiency and accuracy of urinary metabolites was ascertained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis that allowed the identification of some metabolites with highest sensitivity and specificity to discriminate the groups.

conclusionsThe results obtained with this approach suggest the possibility to identify endogenous metabolites as a platform to discovery potential BC biomarkers and paves a way to explore the related metabolomic pathways in order to improve BC diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMetabolomicsMiddle AgedROC CurveSolid Phase MicroextractionVolatile Organic CompoundsBiomarkers, TumorVolatile Organic CompoundsBreast cancerCentral composite designChemometric toolsMetabolomicsUrine

Identifiers

PMID30997581
OpenAlexW2938134593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.