Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997545›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Experimental study of a new original mesh developed for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Fang-Fang Ai, Meng Mao, Ye Zhang, Jia Kang, Lan Zhu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fang-Fang AiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Meng MaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ye ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jia KangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lan ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China. zhu_julie@vip.sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-5483
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81771561Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA16010102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisMost synthetic meshes used in transvaginal surgery are made of polypropylene, which has a stable performance, but does not easily degrade in vivo. However, mesh-related complications are difficult to address and have raised serious concerns. A new biomaterial mesh with good tissue integration and few mesh-related complications is needed. To evaluate the effect of a new bacterial cellulose (BC) mesh on pelvic floor reconstruction following implantation in the vagina of sheep after 1 and 12 weeks.

methodsThe meshes were implanted in the submucosa of the posterior vagina wall of sheep. At 1 and 12 weeks after surgery, mesh-tissue complex (MTC) specimens were harvested for histological studies and biomechanical evaluation. At 12 weeks after surgery, MTC specimens were biomechanically assessed by a uniaxial tension "pulley system".

resultsThe BC mesh elicited a higher inflammatory response than Gynemesh™PS at both 1 and 12 weeks after implantation. Twelve weeks after implantation, the BC mesh resulted in less fibrosis than Gynemesh™PS. Compared with the Gynemesh™PS group, the BC mesh group had increased mRNA expression of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 (P < 0.05), but decreased expression of the anti-inflammatory factor IL-4 (P < 0.05). Twelve weeks after implantation, the ultimate load and maximum elongation percentage of the BC mesh were significantly lower than those of Gynemesh™PS.

conclusionsThe BC mesh could not be a promising biomaterial for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery unless the production process and parameters were improved.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAnimalsCelluloseFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresPelvic Organ ProlapseSheepVaginaCelluloseBacterial celluloseBiomechanicsHistologic biocompatibilityPolypropylene meshSheep model

Identifiers

PMID30997545
OpenAlexW2937522874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.