ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020
Experimental study of a new original mesh developed for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Titanised Compared to Titanised Polypropylene Meshes Induce a Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Angiogenic Response in Fibroblast Co-Cultures.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- Cytokine modulation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: from molecular insights to therapeutic targets.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Review
- The use of animal models in preclinical investigations for the development of a surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2024Review
- Potential of Bacterial Cellulose in Reconstructive Surgery of Body Integumentary System: Preliminary Studies in Animals.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Colonisation by Fibroblasts and Antimicrobial Properties of Surgical Meshes Coated with Bacterial Cellulose.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Bacterial Cellulose Properties Fulfilling Requirements for a Biomaterial of Choice in Reconstructive Surgery and Wound Healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMost synthetic meshes used in transvaginal surgery are made of polypropylene, which has a stable performance, but does not easily degrade in vivo. However, mesh-related complications are difficult to address and have raised serious concerns. A new biomaterial mesh with good tissue integration and few mesh-related complications is needed. To evaluate the effect of a new bacterial cellulose (BC) mesh on pelvic floor reconstruction following implantation in the vagina of sheep after 1 and 12 weeks.
methodsThe meshes were implanted in the submucosa of the posterior vagina wall of sheep. At 1 and 12 weeks after surgery, mesh-tissue complex (MTC) specimens were harvested for histological studies and biomechanical evaluation. At 12 weeks after surgery, MTC specimens were biomechanically assessed by a uniaxial tension "pulley system".
resultsThe BC mesh elicited a higher inflammatory response than Gynemesh™PS at both 1 and 12 weeks after implantation. Twelve weeks after implantation, the BC mesh resulted in less fibrosis than Gynemesh™PS. Compared with the Gynemesh™PS group, the BC mesh group had increased mRNA expression of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 (P < 0.05), but decreased expression of the anti-inflammatory factor IL-4 (P < 0.05). Twelve weeks after implantation, the ultimate load and maximum elongation percentage of the BC mesh were significantly lower than those of Gynemesh™PS.
conclusionsThe BC mesh could not be a promising biomaterial for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery unless the production process and parameters were improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.