Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997412›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2019

Using lean thinking to improve hypertension in a community health centre: a quality improvement report.

Patrick Lee, Linhchi Pham, Stephen Oakley, Kimberly Eng, Elena Freydin, Tayla Rose, Alyssa Ruiz, Joyce Reen, Deborah Suleyman, Vanna Altman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Patrick LeeMedicine, North Shore Medical Center, Salem, Massachusetts, USA.
Linhchi PhamTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Stephen OakleyLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Kimberly EngLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Elena FreydinLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Tayla RoseLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Alyssa RuizLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Joyce ReenLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Deborah SuleymanLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Vanna AltmanLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Kara Keating BenchLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.
Alice LeeLean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Kiame MahaniahLynn Community Health Center, Lynn, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Achieving better care at lower cost in the US healthcare safety net will require federally qualified health centres (FQHC) to implement new models of team-based population healthcare. Lean thinking may offer a way to reduce the financial risk of practice transformation while increasing the likelihood of sustained improvement. Objective: To demonstrate system-level improvement in hypertension control in a large FQHC through the situational use of lean thinking and statistical process control. Setting: Lynn Community Health Center, the third largest FQHC in Massachusetts, USA. Participants: 4762 adult patients with a diagnosis of hypertension. Intervention: First, we created an organisation-wide focus on hypertension. Second, we implemented a multicomponent hypertension care pathway. The lean tools of strategy deployment, standardised work, job instruction, Plan-Do-Study-Adjust, 5S and visual control were used to overcome specific obstacles in the implementation. Measurements: The primary outcome was hypertension control, defined as last measured blood pressure <140/90. Statistical process control was used to establish baseline performance and assess special cause variation resulting from the two-step intervention. Results: Hypertension control improved by 11.6% from a baseline of 66.8% to a 6 month average of 78.2%. Limitations: Durability of system changes has not been demonstrated beyond the 14-month period of the intervention. The observed improvement may underestimate the effect size of the full hypertension care pathway, as two of the five steps have only been partially implemented. Conclusions: Success factors included experienced improvement leaders, a focus on engaging front-line staff, the situational use of lean principles to make the work easier, better, faster and cheaper (in that order of emphasis), and the use of statistical process control to learn from variation. The challenge of transforming care delivery in the safety net warrants a closer look at the principles, relevance and potential impact of lean thinking in FQHCs.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalPatient Care TeamTotal Quality ManagementCommunity Health CentersHumansHypertensionMassachusettsQuality Improvementcardiovascular diseasecare pathwaysdisease managementgeneral practicelean thinkingprimary carequality managementstatistical process control

Identifiers

PMID30997412
PMCPMC6440610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.