Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997410›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2019

Optimising laboratory monitoring of chronic conditions in primary care: a quality improvement framework.

Darunee Whiting, Richard Croker, Jessica Watson, Andy Brogan, Alex J Walker, Tom Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evidence-based tests to monitor adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: rapid reviews and consensus process.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Laboratory Demand Management Strategies-An Overview.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Bariatric surgery: the GP's role in long-term post-bariatric surgery follow-up.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darunee WhitingNHS Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group, South Molton, UK.
Richard CrokerNHS Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group, South Molton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8114-9186
Jessica WatsonBristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andy BroganEasier, Inc, Leominster, UK.
Alex J WalkerEBM DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tom LewisNorthern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, Barnstaple, UK.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2016-09-034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring of chronic conditions accounts for a significant proportion of blood testing in UK primary care; not all of this is based on evidence or guidelines. National benchmarking shows significant variation in testing rates for common blood tests. This project set out to standardise the blood tests used for monitoring of chronic conditions in primary care across North Devon, and to measure and reduce the harms of unwarranted testing. Chronic disease test groups were developed in line with current guidelines and implemented using one-click electronic test ordering systems. The main difference from previous general practitioner practice algorithms was removing the requirement for full blood count and liver function test monitoring for many conditions. Baseline harms of testing were measured and included significant costs, workload and patient anxiety. By defining the scale of the problem, we were able to leverage change across several cycles of quality improvement, using a pathology optimisation forum for peer-led improvement, and developing a framework focusing on what matters to patients. Overall primary care testing rates in North Devon fell by 14% for full blood count testing and 22% for liver function tests, but without a reduction in the number of tests showing possible significant pathology. We estimate that this has reduced testing costs by £200 000 across a population of around 180 000 people and has reduced downstream referral costs by a similar amount. Introduction of simple chronic disease test groups into primary care electronic ordering systems, when used alongside engagement with clinicians, leads to both quality improvement and reduction in system costs.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementChronic DiseaseClinical Laboratory TechniquesGeneral PractitionersHematologic TestsHumansPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementUnited Kingdomchronic disease managementinformation technologypathologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID30997410
PMCPMC6440689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.