Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997397›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2019

Systemic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of intravitreal aflibercept injection in patients with retinal diseases.

Peter K Kaiser, Laurent Kodjikian, Jean-Francois Korobelnik, Julia Winkler, Albert Torri, Oliver Zeitz, Robert Vitti, Cristiane Ahlers, Torsten Zimmermann, A Thomas Dicioccio and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anti-VEGF and Other Novel Therapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter K KaiserDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5126-045X
Laurent KodjikianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Croix-Rousse Teaching Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, University of Medicine Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jean-Francois KorobelnikOphthalmology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Julia WinklerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Occams, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.
Albert TorriRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, USA.
Oliver ZeitzBayer Pharma, Berlin, Germany.
Robert VittiRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, USA.
Cristiane AhlersBayer Pharma, Berlin, Germany.
Torsten ZimmermannBayer Pharma, Berlin, Germany.
A Thomas DicioccioRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, USA.
Joachim HöchelBayer Pharma, Berlin, Germany.
Bayer (Germany) · DERegeneron (United States) · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCleveland Clinic · USUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExplore relationships between systemic exposure to intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) and systemic pharmacodynamic effects via post hoc analyses of clinical trials of IAI for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular oedema (DME). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adults from VGFT-OD-0702.PK (n=6), VGFT-OD-0512 (n= 5), VIEW 2 (n=1204) and VIVID-DME (n=404) studies were included. Validated ELISAs were used to measure concentrations of free and bound aflibercept (reported as adjusted bound) in plasma at predefined time points in each study. Non-compartmental analysis of concentration-time data was obtained with dense sampling in VGFT-OD-0702.PK and VGFT-OD-0512. Sparse sampling was used in VIEW 2 and VIVID-DME. Blood pressure or intrarenal function changes were also investigated.

resultsFollowing intravitreal administration, free aflibercept plasma concentrations quickly decreased once maximum concentrations were achieved at 1-3 days postdose; pharmacologically inactive adjusted bound aflibercept concentrations increased over a longer period and reached plateau 7 days postdose. Ratios of free and adjusted bound aflibercept decreased over time. There were no meaningful changes in systolic/diastolic blood pressure over the duration of each study at all systemic aflibercept exposure levels. For all treatment arms in VIEW 2, there was no clinically relevant change in mean intrarenal function from baseline at week 52. Overall, incidence of systemic adverse events in VIEW 2 and VIVID-DME was low and consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

conclusionIAI administration was not associated with systemic effects in patients with nAMD or DME as measured by blood pressure or intrarenal function, two known pharmacologically relevant effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor.

Indexed as

drugspharmacologyretinatreatment medicalvision

Identifiers

PMID30997397
PMCPMC6440611
OpenAlexW2923859454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.