Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997376›Full record

ReviewGynecologic oncology reports2019

Pancreaticobiliary metastasis presenting as primary mucinous ovarian neoplasm: A systematic literature review.

Sarah A Ackroyd, Lauren Goetsch, Jennifer Brown, Karen Houck, Congli Wang, Enrique Hernandez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Investigating age and ethnicity as novel high-risk phenotypes in mucinous ovarian cancer: retrospective study in a multi-ethnic population.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A AckroydTemple University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States of America.
Lauren GoetschTemple University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States of America.
Jennifer BrownTemple University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States of America.
Karen HouckTemple University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States of America.
Congli WangTemple University Hospital, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States of America.
Enrique HernandezTemple University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States of America.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USTemple University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

True primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas are rarer than originally thought and their clinical behavior and treatment response are different than more common epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Secondary ovarian neoplasms often mimic the clinical and histological features of mucinous ovarian cancer making their diagnosis, and therefore treatment, more difficult. Misdiagnosis can have a significant impact on both treatment and prognosis. The majority of these secondary ovarian neoplasms arise from the gastrointestinal tract, with mucinous histology often of pancreaticobiliary origin. Our study objective was to review current evidence distinguishing pancreaticobiliary ovarian metastasis from primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma. We utilized a PubMed search using MeSH terms and selected articles were reviewed, synthesized and summarized. Thirty-nine articles were included in the review. The clinical, gross, histological and immunohistochemical features distinguishing primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas from pancreaticobiliary ovarian metastasis were identified. Compared to primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma, metastatic pancreaticobiliary tumors are more often bilateral, <10 cm, have irregular external surface and surface implants, display an infiltrative pattern of invasion and stain for MUC1 and CK17. Primary ovarian mucinous tumors rarely (<3%) have signet ring cells or involvement of the hilum. Metastatic mucinous tumors mimic their primary mucinous ovarian counterparts and their clinical and histopathological features overlap in many ways. However, these metastatic tumors have features that can help differentiate them from primary mucinous carcinoma. With a high index of suspicion and knowledge of the reviewed features, distinguishing these tumors will continue to become easier.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryMetastatic pancreaticobiliary tumorsOvarian mucinous tumors

Identifiers

PMID30997376
PMCPMC6453658
OpenAlexW2925178335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.