Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997151›Full record

ArticleRMD open2019

Re-treatment with abatacept plus methotrexate for disease flare after complete treatment withdrawal in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from the AVERT study.

Paul Emery, Gerd R Burmester, Vivian P Bykerk, Bernard G Combe, Daniel E Furst, Michael A Maldonado, Tom Wj Huizinga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Predicting abatacept retention using machine learning.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Pre-RA: Can early diagnosis lead to prevention?Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Paul EmeryLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Gerd R BurmesterDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vivian P BykerkDivision of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Bernard G CombeDepartment of Rheumatology, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Daniel E FurstDivision of Rheumatology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Michael A MaldonadoImmunoscience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Tom Wj HuizingaDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHospital for Special Surgery · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLNIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To complete reporting of outcomes after total withdrawal of all rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy and re-treatment after flare in Assessing Methods: Patients with early RA were initially randomised to double-blind, weekly subcutaneous abatacept plus methotrexate, or abatacept or methotrexate monotherapy. At month 12, patients with Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 C reactive protein (CRP) <3.2 had all RA treatments rapidly withdrawn and were observed for ≤12 months or until flare. After ≥3 months' withdrawal, patients with protocol-defined RA flare received open-label abatacept plus methotrexate for 6 months (re-treatment). Results: Proportion of patients in DAS28-CRP-defined remission remained numerically higher in original abatacept plus methotrexate and abatacept arms versus methotrexate arm up to day 253 of withdrawal. At the end of the withdrawal period, few patients remained in remission across all arms: 9/73 (12.3%), 7/50 (14.0%) and 6/53 (11.3%), respectively. For patients entering re-treatment, after 6 months' re-treatment, 95/124 (76.6%) and 78/124 (62.9%) patients achieved DAS28-CRP <3.2 and <2.6, respectively; mean changes in DAS28-CRP and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores from re-treatment baseline were -2.87 and 0.76, respectively. Re-treatment was well tolerated; exposure-adjusted infection rates per 100 patient-years were lower with abatacept plus methotrexate during withdrawal (7.2) and re-treatment (17.2) versus initial treatment periods of months 0-6 (116.6) and 6-12 (64.6). Conclusions: Most patients flared within 6 months of therapy withdrawal and few sustained major responses for 1 year. Re-treatment with abatacept plus methotrexate was effective and well tolerated in this controlled setting.

Indexed as

AbataceptAdultArthritis, RheumatoidDisease ProgressionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsTreatment OutcomeAbataceptMethotrexatedisease activityDMARDs (biologic)methotrexateremissionrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30997151
PMCPMC6446179
OpenAlexW2914834251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.