Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30997136›Full record

SynthesisOpen heart

Reducing delay in patients with acute coronary syndrome and other time-critical conditions: a systematic review to identify the behaviour change techniques associated with effective interventions.

Barbara Farquharson, Purva Abhyankar, Karen Smith, Stephan U Dombrowski, Shaun Treweek, Nadine Dougall, Brian Williams, Marie Johnston

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Towards definitions of time-sensitive conditions in prehospital care.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Barbara FarquharsonSchool of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9295-3156
Purva AbhyankarSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Karen SmithNHS Tayside School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Stephan U DombrowskiFaculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada.
Shaun TreweekHealth Sciences Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Nadine DougallSchool of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Brian WilliamsSchool of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Marie JohnstonInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/1025Chief Scientist Office HSRU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Time to treatment in many conditions, particularly acute coronary syndrome, is critical to reducing mortality. Delay between onset of symptoms and treatment remains a worldwide problem. Reducing patient delay has been particularly challenging. Embedding behaviour change techniques (BCTs) within interventions might lead to shorter delay. Objective: To identify which BCTs are associated with reductions in patient delay among people with symptoms or conditions where time to treatment is critical. Methods: The data sources were Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO. Study eligibility criteria include intervention evaluations (randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies) involving adults (aged >18 years) and including an outcome measure of patient delay up to August 2016. Study appraisal and synthesis methods include screening potential studies using a transparent, replicable process. Study characteristics, outcomes and BCTs were extracted from eligible studies. Results: From 39 studies (200 538 participants), just over half (n=20) reported a significant reduction in delay. 19 BCTs were identified, plus 5 additional techniques, with a mean of 2 (SD=2.3) BCTs and 2 (SD=0.7) per intervention. No clear pattern between BCTs and effectiveness was found. In studies examining patient delay specifically, three of four studies that included two or more BCTs, in addition to the two most commonly used additional techniques, reported a significant reduction in delay. Conclusions: Around half of the interventions to reduce prehospital delay with time-critical symptoms report a significant reduction in delay time. It is not clear what differentiates effective from non-effective interventions, although in relation to patient delay particularly additional use of BCTs might be helpful. Trial registration number: CRD42014013106.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromedelay: behaviour changeeducationpsychology

Identifiers

PMID30997136
PMCPMC6443141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.