ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2019
Successful inferior vena cava filter removal using pacemaker lead extraction methods.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced retrieval technique using pacemaker lead extraction methods for a long-term implanted inferior vena cava filter with caval penetration of the pancreas.Journal of cardiology cases · 2025Article
- Successful endovascular retrieval of an inferior vena cava filter penetrating into aorta.Journal of cardiology cases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are often used to treat deep vein thrombosis. IVC filters may become difficult to extract because of adhesion around the device, and those permanently left inside the patient may cause injurious complications. We describe a novel IVC filter extraction technique using pacemaker lead extraction tools. A 26-year-old woman, diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis by computed tomography, received an IVC filter (Gunther Tulip, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) implantation for prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism. Eleven weeks later, extraction of the IVC filter by a manual method and snaring technique was unsuccessful because of adhesion to the blood vessel wall. The patient was referred to our hospital for filter removal using pacemaker lead extraction tools. Extraction was performed in an operation room under general anesthesia in the presence of a cardiovascular surgeon, to manage inadvertent perforation. Part of the adhered tissue around the four limbs of the filter was dissected using a 12 Fr laser sheath; protruding anchors were carefully dissected with a telescoping mechanical sheath using a counter-traction technique. Her postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged without complications. A sophisticated removal procedure with pacemaker lead extraction tools can be used to remove problematic IVC filters. <
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.