ArticleMolecular vision2019
Reliability and reproducibility of a rodent model of choroidal neovascularization based on the subretinal injection of polyethylene glycol.
Article in Molecular vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-Depth Analysis of the Intravitreal Biocompatibility of Polyethylene Glycol of Different Molecular Weight in an In Vivo Porcine Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- AAV2 and AAV9 tropism and transgene expression in the mouse eye and major tissues after intravitreal and subretinal delivery.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2023Article
- Subretinal injection in mice to study retinal physiology and disease.Nature protocols · 2022Review
- The Learning Curve of Murine Subretinal Injection Among Clinically Trained Ophthalmic Surgeons.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- PEGylated Recombinant Human Growth Hormone JintrolongFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Acute-onset central serous retinopathy after immunization with COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of a rodent choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model by subretinal injection of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Methods: C57BL/6 mice were injected subretinally with 2 μl PBS (Gibco, Invitrogen, Paisley, UK; n=14) or PEG (1 mg; n=18). Animals were sacrificed at either 0, 5, 14 or 21 days. Eyes were embedded in paraffin wax and serial sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin or Fontana-Masson or immunostained for cytokeratin 8/18, isolectin B4 (IB4), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and von Willebrand factor (vWF). Results: Both the PBS and PEG groups had retinal degeneration and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid modifications at 5 and 14 days. Pigment clumps and cell vacuolization at the RPE/choroid were identified as melanin-containing RPE cells. In PEG-injected eyes, CK8/18-positive cellular elements were present at the subretinal space, IB4 immunoreactivity was significantly increased and choroidal vessels appeared diffusely thickened. However, neither VEGF nor vWF (angiogenesis/neovascularization markers) were detected in either group. At 21 days, the retina/choroid of PBS-injected animals was normal in appearance, while retina/choroid changes remained in some PEG-injected mice. Conclusions: Subretinal injection of PEG induced retina/choroid degenerative modifications that mimic the initial steps of human CNV. However, ocular changes were heterogeneous among animals from PBS and PEG groups and did not follow a consistent pattern while most PBS-injected animals showed similar degenerative changes. Abnormal growth of new vessels originating from the choroidal vasculature was not observed. Therefore, we consider that this model does not consistently reproduce CNV and that researchers should choose other rodent models of CNV to avoid misinterpreting their results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30996588PMC6441359W2944340849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.