ReviewJournal of business ethics : JBE2018
Cross-Sector Partnerships for Systemic Change: Systematized Literature Review and Agenda for Further Research.
Review in Journal of business ethics : JBE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing the social determinants of youth mental health in Newham and Northern Devon: reflections on co-design and systems change.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Framing resonance and variation in social media: the case of slow food on Instagram.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Strategic Alliances in Global Health: Innovative Perspectives in the Era of Sustainable Development.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Catalyzing alignment and systems transformation through cross-sector partnerships: Findings from the California Accountable Communities for Health Initiative.Health services research · 2024Observational
- Mobilising strategic alliances with community organisations to address work-related mental injury: a qualitative study guided by collaboration theory.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Place and the Structuring of Cross-Sector Partnerships: The Moral and Material Conflicts Over Healthcare and Homelessness.Journal of business ethics : JBE · 2023Article
- Food Loss and Waste Actions: Experiences of the Costa Rican Food Loss and Waste Reduction Network.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Way to Boost the Impact of Business on 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Co-creation With Non-profits for Social Innovation.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Knowledge mobilisation in practice: an evaluation of the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The literature on cross-sector partnerships has increasingly focused attention on broader systemic or system-level change. However, research to date has been partial and fragmented, and the very idea of systemic change remains conceptually underdeveloped. In this article, we seek to better understand what is meant by systemic change in the context of cross-sector partnerships and use this as a basis to discuss the contributions to the Thematic Symposium. We present evidence from a broad, multidisciplinary systematized review of the extant literature, develop an original definition of systemic change, and offer a framework for understanding the interactions between actors, partnerships, systemic change, and issues. We conclude with some suggestions for future research that we believe will enhance the literature in its next phase of development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.