Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30996317›Full record

ReviewNature2019

Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean.

Philip W Boyd, Hervé Claustre, Marina Levy, David A Siegel, Thomas Weber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spinning carbon and sinking phosphorus: Misaligned cycles in the sea.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integrated algal systems for industrial COArchives of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philip W BoydInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. philip.boyd@utas.edu.au.
Hervé Claustre *Sorbonne Université & CNRS, Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche-sur-mer (LOV), Villefranche-sur-Mer, France.
Marina Levy *Sorbonne Université, LOCEAN-IPSL, CNRS/IRD/MNHN, Paris, France.
David A Siegel *Department of Geography and Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Thomas Weber *Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ocean's ability to sequester carbon away from the atmosphere exerts an important control on global climate. The biological pump drives carbon storage in the deep ocean and is thought to function via gravitational settling of organic particles from surface waters. However, the settling flux alone is often insufficient to balance mesopelagic carbon budgets or to meet the demands of subsurface biota. Here we review additional biological and physical mechanisms that inject suspended and sinking particles to depth. We propose that these 'particle injection pumps' probably sequester as much carbon as the gravitational pump, helping to close the carbon budget and motivating further investigation into their environmental control.

Indexed as

Carbon SequestrationGravitationAquatic OrganismsAtmosphereBiotaCarbonCarbon DioxideOceans and SeasPhotosynthesisSeawaterSolubilityCarbonCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.