Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30996267›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2020

Which patients with ischaemic priapism require further investigation for malignancy?

Mark James Johnson, Marcus Hallerstrom, Hussain M Alnajjar, Thomas Frederick Johnson, Marta Skrodzka, Giovanni Chiriaco, Asif Muneer, David James Ralph

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review of the role of imaging in the diagnosis of priapism.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Review
  3. [Ischemic Priapism: evaluation in a third-level hospital in Mexico].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. [Priapism].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark James JohnsonAndrology Department, University College, 47 Wimpole St, London, W1G 8PH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-1632
Marcus HallerstromAndrology Department, University College, 47 Wimpole St, London, W1G 8PH, UK.
Hussain M AlnajjarAndrology Department, University College, 47 Wimpole St, London, W1G 8PH, UK.
Thomas Frederick JohnsonAndrology Department, University College, 47 Wimpole St, London, W1G 8PH, UK.
Marta SkrodzkaAndrology Department, University College, 47 Wimpole St, London, W1G 8PH, UK.
Giovanni ChiriacoAndrology Department, University College, 47 Wimpole St, London, W1G 8PH, UK.
Asif MuneerAndrology Department, University College, 47 Wimpole St, London, W1G 8PH, UK.
David James RalphAndrology Department, University College, 47 Wimpole St, London, W1G 8PH, UK. david@andrology.co.uk.
University College London · GBWikimedia UK · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischaemic priapism (IP) is characterised by a persistent, painful penile erection lasting for >4 h. Many causes of IP have been identified including haematological dyscrasias (particularly, sickle cell disease), drugs and rarely malignancy. There are also a large proportion of men, in which no aetiology is identified. Identification of men at risk for malignancy provides a diagnostic challenge to the clinicians looking after these patients. All cases of IP between 2007 and 2017 at a single tertiary andrology unit were identified. The case notes and electronic records of these patients were reviewed to identify cases of malignant priapism. Men with idiopathic IP were used as a control group for comparative statistics. In total, 412 men with IP were identified, 202 of which had idiopathic IP. Within this group, the prevalence of malignant priapism was 3.5% (n = 11). MP secondary to local invasion or penile metastases occurred in seven of the 11 men (bladder × 3, prostate, lung, urethral and chondrosarcoma of the pelvis). MP secondary to haematological malignancy occurred in the remaining four (chronic myeloid leukaemia  ×  2, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, and myelodysplasia). IP was the initial presentation of malignancy in seven of the patients (64%). An abnormally low haemoglobin value (reference range 130-180 g/dl) was found in 82% (n = 9) of the men with MP. The mean haemoglobin value in men with MP was 109.64 ± 20.30 g/dl compared to the control of 131.87 ± g/dl. This difference was considered highly significant p = 0.0046. Men with MP also appear to have a very poor prognosis with an 18-month mortality of 64% (n = 7). Malignancy is a rare and important cause of IP. A low haemoglobin is a predictor of malignancy and warrants further investigation in IP.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPenisPriapismRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30996267
OpenAlexW2935922190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.