Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30996222›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Macaque dorsal premotor cortex exhibits decision-related activity only when specific stimulus-response associations are known.

Megan Wang, Christéva Montanède, Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Diogo Peixoto, Krishna V Shenoy, John F Kalaska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Population encoding of observed and actual somatosensations in the human posterior parietal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. An abstract categorical decision code in dorsal premotor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan WangNeurosciences Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Christéva MontanèdeDépartement de Neurosciences, Pavillon Paul-G.-Desmarais, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Chandramouli ChandrasekaranDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Diogo PeixotoDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Krishna V ShenoyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
John F KalaskaDépartement de Neurosciences, Pavillon Paul-G.-Desmarais, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada. john.francis.kalaska@umontreal.ca.

Funding

Organization and Dynamics of Premotor and Prefrontal Cortical Circuits Mediating Goal-Directed BehaviorR00NS092972 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI CHANDRASEKARAN, CHANDRAMOULI · 2018 to 2020
$747k
Organization and Dynamics of Premotor and Prefrontal Cortical Circuits Mediating Goal-Directed BehaviorK99NS092972 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHANDRASEKARAN, CHANDRAMOULI · 2015 to 2016
$175k
NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS092972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How deliberation on sensory cues and action selection interact in decision-related brain areas is still not well understood. Here, monkeys reached to one of two targets, whose colors alternated randomly between trials, by discriminating the dominant color of a checkerboard cue composed of different numbers of squares of the two target colors in different trials. In a Targets First task the colored targets appeared first, followed by the checkerboard; in a Checkerboard First task, this order was reversed. After both cues appeared in both tasks, responses of dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) units covaried with action choices, strength of evidence for action choices, and RTs- hallmarks of decision-related activity. However, very few units were modulated by checkerboard color composition or the color of the chosen target, even during the checkerboard deliberation epoch of the Checkerboard First task. These findings implicate PMd in the action-selection but not the perceptual components of the decision-making process in these tasks.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorCuesMacaca mulattaMaleMotor CortexNeuronsPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID30996222
PMCPMC6470163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.