Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30996164›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2019

Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Secondary Prophylactic Pegylated G-CSF in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with mFOLFIRINOX: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Kentaro Yamao, Mamoru Takenaka, Tomoe Yoshikawa, Rei Ishikawa, Ayana Okamoto, Tomohiro Yamazaki, Atsushi Nakai, Shunsuke Omoto, Ken Kamata, Kosuke Minaga and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pancreatic Cancer: Current Concepts, Trends, and Future Directions.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kentaro YamaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Mamoru TakenakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Tomoe YoshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Rei IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Ayana OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Tomohiro YamazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Atsushi NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Shunsuke OmotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Ken KamataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Kosuke MinagaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Satoru HagiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Toshiharu SakuraiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Naoshi NishidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Yasutaka ChibaClinical Research Center, Kindai University Hospital, Japan.
Tomohiro WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Although modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX, mFFX) is widely used for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), maintenance of the standard dose intensity is often difficult due to the high incidence of neutropenic events. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (Peg G) is a long-lasting G-CSF agent that is applicable for prophylaxis against neutropenic complications. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of mFFX combined with secondary prophylaxis using Peg G in advanced PDAC patients. Methods Advanced PDAC patients who had received more than two cycles of mFFX were analyzed. The clinical safety and efficacy were compared between patients in the Peg G group and those in the non-Peg G group in a retrospective manner. Results Among 45 patients treated with mFFX, 28 exhibited grade 3-4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia. Among these 28 patients, 4 who received only 1 or 2 mFFX cycles were excluded from this study. Finally, 11 patients in the Peg G group and 13 in the non-Peg G group were enrolled. The combination therapy with Peg G and mFFX markedly prolonged the progression-free survival compared with the non-Peg G group, and its effects were associated with a reduced incidence of neutropenic events as well as lower rates of dosage reduction, delayed chemotherapy due to neutropenic events and altered blood cell counts after chemotherapy. Conclusion The scheduled administration of secondary prophylactic Peg G prolonged the progression-free survival in patients treated with mFFX. The combination therapy of Peg G and mFFX may be recommended in patients who exhibit grade 3-4 neutropenic events after prior mFFX cycles.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBlood Cell CountFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeutropeniaPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactormFOLFIRINOXpancreatic cancerpegylated G-CSF

Identifiers

PMID30996164
PMCPMC6702006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.