Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30996127›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Cancer stemness, intratumoral heterogeneity, and immune response across cancers.

Alex Miranda, Phineas T Hamilton, Allen W Zhang, Swetansu Pattnaik, Etienne Becht, Artur Mezheyeuski, Jarle Bruun, Patrick Micke, Aurélien de Reynies, Brad H Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 371 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
371citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

371 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

311 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alex MirandaDeeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada.
Phineas T HamiltonDeeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada.
Allen W ZhangDepartment of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.
Swetansu PattnaikThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Etienne BechtSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138648 Singapore.
Artur MezheyeuskiDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4394-2634
Jarle BruunDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway.
Patrick MickeDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Aurélien de ReyniesProgramme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, 75013 Paris, France.
Brad H NelsonDeeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada; bnelson@bccrc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory programs that control the function of stem cells are active in cancer and confer properties that promote progression and therapy resistance. However, the impact of a stem cell-like tumor phenotype ("stemness") on the immunological properties of cancer has not been systematically explored. Using gene-expression-based metrics, we evaluated the association of stemness with immune cell infiltration and genomic, transcriptomic, and clinical parameters across 21 solid cancers. We found pervasive negative associations between cancer stemness and anticancer immunity. This occurred despite high stemness cancers exhibiting increased mutation load, cancer-testis antigen expression, and intratumoral heterogeneity. Stemness was also strongly associated with cell-intrinsic suppression of endogenous retroviruses and type I IFN signaling, and increased expression of multiple therapeutically accessible immunosuppressive pathways. Thus, stemness is not only a fundamental process in cancer progression but may provide a mechanistic link between antigenicity, intratumoral heterogeneity, and immune suppression across cancers.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorDatabases, GeneticGene ExpressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsTranscriptomeTumor Microenvironmentantitumor immunitycancer stemnessintratumoral heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID30996127
PMCPMC6500180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.