Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30996023›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

The Genome of C57BL/6J "Eve", the Mother of the Laboratory Mouse Genome Reference Strain.

Vishal Kumar Sarsani, Narayanan Raghupathy, Ian T Fiddes, Joel Armstrong, Francoise Thibaud-Nissen, Oraya Zinder, Mohan Bolisetty, Kerstin Howe, Doug Hinerfeld, Xiaoan Ruan and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mouse phenome database: curated data repository with interactive multi-population and multi-trait analyses.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Cancer-Like Fragmentomic Characteristics of Somatic Variants in Cell-Free DNA.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vishal Kumar SarsaniThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME.
Narayanan RaghupathyThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME.
Ian T FiddesUC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Santa Cruz, California, Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
Joel ArmstrongUC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Santa Cruz, California, Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
Francoise Thibaud-NissenNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894.
Oraya ZinderThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME.
Mohan BolisettyThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME.
Kerstin HoweWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Doug HinerfeldNanoString Technologies, Inc, and.
Xiaoan RuanThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.
Lucy RoweThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME.
Mary BarterThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME.
Guruprasad AnandaThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.
Benedict PatenUC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Santa Cruz, California, Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
George M WeinstockThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.
Gary A ChurchillThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME.
Michael V WilesThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME.
Valerie A SchneiderNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894.
Anuj SrivastavaThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT laura.reinholdt@jax.org anuj.srivastava@jax.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-3993
Laura G ReinholdtThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor ME laura.reinholdt@jax.org anuj.srivastava@jax.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4054-4048
Jackson Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USNational Center for Biotechnology Information · USNanostring Technologies (United States) · USWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

National Biomedical Information ServicesZIHLM200888 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PALTOO, DINA · 2009 to 2025
$5200.7M
Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
The Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center at The Jackson LaboratoryU42OD010921 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LAURA G REINHOLDT · 2012 to 2026
$21.4M
Resources for Comparative Mendelian Disease GenomicsR24OD021325 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BERGSTROM, DAVID ERIC, REINHOLDT, LAURA G · 2016 to 2023
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NIH HHS R24 OD021325NIH HHS U42 OD010921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isogenic laboratory mouse strains enhance reproducibility because individual animals are genetically identical. For the most widely used isogenic strain, C57BL/6, there exists a wealth of genetic, phenotypic, and genomic data, including a high-quality reference genome (GRCm38.p6). Now 20 years after the first release of the mouse reference genome, C57BL/6J mice are at least 26 inbreeding generations removed from GRCm38 and the strain is now maintained with periodic reintroduction of cryorecovered mice derived from a single breeder pair, aptly named Adam and Eve. To provide an update to the mouse reference genome that more accurately represents the genome of today's C57BL/6J mice, we took advantage of long read, short read, and optical mapping technologies to generate a

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAnimalsComputational BiologyFemaleInbreedingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPedigreePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideC57BL/6Jde novo genome assemblylaboratory mouselong read sequencingMus musculus domesticusreference genomesreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID30996023
PMCPMC6553538
OpenAlexW2909181438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.