Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30995930›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2019

Discriminative validity of the EQ-5D-5 L and SF-12 in older adults with arthritis.

Andrews K Tawiah, Fatima Al Sayah, Arto Ohinmaa, Jeffrey A Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. "Cost-effectiveness of ACL treatment is dependent on age and activity level: a systematic review".Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Subjects suffering from bipolar disorder taking lithium are less likely to report physical pain: a FACE-BD study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrews K TawiahFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 3-44 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, Canada. atawiah@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-7796
Fatima Al SayahSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, 2-040 Li Ka Shing Center for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Arto OhinmaaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-267 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Jeffrey A JohnsonSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, 2-040 Li Ka Shing Center for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EQ-5D-5 L and the SF-12 are the most commonly used generic measures of health-related quality of life among people with arthritis. However, there is little evidence on the extent to which the individual dimensions and domains of these instruments perform among this population. The objective was to examine the discriminative validity of the EQ-5D-5 L and the SF-12 version 2 (and SF-6D) in capturing the burden of arthritis on health-related quality of life in older adults.

methodsCross-sectional data from the Alberta Retired Teachers Association survey were used. A known-groups approach, with a-priori hypotheses, was used to examine the discriminative validity of the domain and summary scores of the EQ-5D-5 L and the SF-12 version 2 (and SF-6D). Groups were defined based on self-reported of arthritis, chronic pain level, presence and number of comorbidities, and self-reported health status.

resultsMean age of respondents (N = 2844) was 68.6 (standard deviation [SD] 5.9) years; 54.8% were female, with mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.2 kg/m

conclusionOverall, the EQ-5D-5 L pain/discomfort and mobility dimensions, and the SF-12 bodily pain scale had moderate discriminative ability among older adults with arthritis. However, both instruments had limited discriminative ability for chronic pain. The importance and nature of chronic pain assessment in a given application need to be considered when choosing any of these instruments for measuring health-related quality of life in this patient population.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAlbertaArthritisChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesarthritisdiscriminative validityEQ-5D-5 LpainSF-12SF-6D

Identifiers

PMID30995930
PMCPMC6469074
OpenAlexW2940317701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.