Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30995909›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2019

Therapeutic novelties in migraine: new drugs, new hope?

Thien Phu Do, Song Guo, Messoud Ashina

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Evaluation of the risk of hypertension in patients treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in a real-life study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Headache: Treatment update.eNeurologicalSci · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thien Phu DoDanish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Song GuoDanish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Messoud AshinaDanish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. ashina@dadlnet.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past decade, migraine research has identified novel drug targets. In this review, we discuss recent data on emerging anti-migraine therapies. MAIN BODY: The development of ditans, gepants and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of migraine is one of the greatest advances in the migraine field. Lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant will extend our therapeutic armamentarium for managing acute migraine attacks when triptans are not effective or contraindicated due to cardiovascular disorders. The monoclonal antibodies are migraine specific prophylactic drugs with high responder rates and favorable adverse event profiles. Furthermore, they offer convenient treatment regimens of 4- or 12-week intervals.

conclusionCollectively, novel migraine therapies represent a major progress in migraine treatment and will undoubtedly transform headache medicine.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsHumansMigraine DisordersPyridinesPyrrolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTryptaminesAnalgesicsCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsPyridinesPyrrolesTryptaminesubrogepantAdverse eventAntibodyDitanEfficacyGepantMigraineRandomized clinical trialTolerability

Identifiers

PMID30995909
PMCPMC6734360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.