ArticleMicromachines2019
Integrating Microfabrication into Biological Investigations: the Benefits of Interdisciplinarity.
Article in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating bioengineering, super-resolution microscopy and mechanobiology in autophagy research: addendum to the guidelines (4th edition).Autophagy · 2025Article
- Editorial: Multicellularity: Views from cellular signaling and mechanics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Microfabrication approaches for oral research and clinical dentistry.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2023Review
- Open-source personal pipetting robots with live-cell incubation and microscopy compatibility.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Effect of Controlled Microtopography on Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Review
- Microengineered systems with iPSC-derived cardiac and hepatic cells to evaluate drug adverse effects.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Mechanobiology of Autophagy: The Unexplored Side of Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Microfluidics for Cell and Other Organisms.Micromachines · 2019Article
- The paradigm of stem cell secretome in tissue repair and regeneration: Present and future perspectives.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of micro and nanotechnologies, such as microfabrication, have impacted scientific research and contributed to meaningful real-world applications, to a degree seen during historic technological revolutions. Some key areas benefitting from the invention and advancement of microfabrication platforms are those of biological and biomedical sciences. Modern therapeutic approaches, involving point-of-care, precision or personalized medicine, are transitioning from the experimental phase to becoming the standard of care. At the same time, biological research benefits from the contribution of microfluidics at every level from single cell to tissue engineering and organoids studies. The aim of this commentary is to describe, through proven examples, the interdisciplinary process used to develop novel biological technologies and to emphasize the role of technical knowledge in empowering researchers who are specialized in a niche area to look beyond and innovate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.