Trial reportPrenatal diagnosis2019
Digital vs face-to-face information provision in patient counselling for prenatal screening: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Prenatal diagnosis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital vs face-to-face information provision in patient counselling for prenatal screening: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial.Prenatal diagnosis · 2019Trial
- Uptake, utility and resource requirements of a genetic counselling telephone helpline within the BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for mainstreamed BRCA testing in patients with breast cancer.Journal of medical genetics · 2025Article
- The Influence of the Partner's Involvement in Antenatal Genetic Group Counseling on Pregnant individuals' Scores on Tests of Vital Knowledge Relating to Pregnancy.American journal of perinatology · 2024Article
- Impact of a virtual antenatal intervention for improved diet and iron intake in Kapilvastu district, Nepal - the VALID randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Informal Prenatal Genetic Screening Education: What can you learn from Google and YouTube?Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Multisite assessment of the impact of a prenatal testing educational App on patient knowledge and preparedness for prenatal testing decision making.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- External Quality Assessment of Maternal Serum Levels of Alpha-Fetoprotein, Free Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, and Unconjugated Estriol in Detecting Down Syndrome and Neural Tube Defects in the Second Trimester of 87 Maternal Serum Samples, Based on 105-139 Days.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
- Understanding the Current Landscape of Health Literacy Interventions within Health Systems.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2022Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of a French Version of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale (GCSS) as an Outcome Measure of Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the effect of education on perceived stress of mother candidates for amniocentesis.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
- The effect of education on anxiety of pregnant mothers before amniocentesis.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate face-to-face information provision in patient counselling for prenatal screening compared with two forms of digital information provision, namely, noninteractive instructional video or interactive video.
methodWe performed a prospective, noninferiority, cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing face-to-face (usual care) with two forms of digital information provision (intervention) in counselling for prenatal screening. This study was performed in the Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands, in 2017, and included women in the first trimester of pregnancy. Main outcomes were knowledge gained by the patient and counselling duration. We performed a noninferiority analysis.
resultsOne hundred forty-one women were included, randomized, and analysed. The baseline characteristics were comparable. The intervention group was noninferior compared with the control group regarding the level of satisfaction. The knowledge grade difference was higher after using intervention, and the duration was significantly longer in the face-to-face group at 23 minutes versus 16 minutes. The addition of interaction with the video made no difference in any of the outcomes.
conclusionAdding an instructional video to patient counselling is of added value to improve patient's knowledge and shorten time consumption of the counsellor, therefore possibly saving costs. But this form of counselling maintains the same level of satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.