Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30995251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Fluorescent nucleic acid probe in droplets for bacterial sorting (FNAP-sort) as a high-throughput screening method for environmental bacteria with various growth rates.

Yuri Ota, Kanako Saito, Taeko Takagi, Satoko Matsukura, Masamune Morita, Satoshi Tsuneda, Naohiro Noda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  3. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Droplet-Based Microfluidics: Applications in Pharmaceuticals.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Droplet Microfluidics for Microbial Biotechnology.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Empowering a Methanol-DependentFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuri OtaDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanako SaitoDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Taeko TakagiBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ibaraki, Japan.
Satoko MatsukuraBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ibaraki, Japan.
Masamune MoritaBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ibaraki, Japan.
Satoshi TsunedaDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Naohiro NodaDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7592-5495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a new method for selectively sorting droplets containing growing bacteria using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based RNA probe. Bacteria and the FRET-based RNA probe are encapsulated into nanoliter-scale droplets, which are incubated to allow for cell growth. The FRET-based RNA probe is cleaved by RNase derived from the bacteria propagated in the droplets, resulting in an increase in fluorescence intensity. The fluorescent droplets containing growing bacteria are distinguishable from quenching droplets, which contain no cells. We named this method FNAP-sort based on the use of a fluorescent nucleic acid probe in droplets for bacterial sorting. Droplets containing the FRET-based RNA probe and four species of pure cultures, which grew in the droplets, were selectively enriched on the basis of fluorescence emission. Furthermore, fluorescent droplets were sorted from more than 500,000 droplets generated using environmental soil bacteria and the FRET-based RNA probe on days 1, 3, and 7 with repeated incubation and sorting. The bacterial compositions of sorted droplets differed on days 1, 3, and 7; moreover, on day 7, the bacterial composition of the fluorescent droplets was drastically different from that of the quenching droplets. We believe that FNAP-sort is useful for high-throughput cultivation and sorting of environmental samples containing bacteria with various growth rates, including slow-growing microbes that require long incubation times.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysNucleic Acid ProbesBacteriaDNA, BacterialFlow CytometryFluorescenceFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferMicrofluidicsRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologyTime FactorsDNA, BacterialFluorescent DyesNucleic Acid ProbesRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30995251
PMCPMC6469844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.