Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30994958›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019

Vessel wall and lumen characteristics with age in healthy participants using 3T intracranial vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging.

Petrice M Cogswell, Sarah K Lants, L Taylor Davis, Manus J Donahue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petrice M CogswellDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8128-4476
Sarah K LantsDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
L Taylor DavisDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Manus J DonahueDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

Replacement and Upgrade of a 3T MR Scanner for ResearchS10OD021771 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2016 to 2016
$2.0M
Imaging collaterals and tissue metabolism in patients with Moyamoya syndromeR01NS097763 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DONAHUE, MANUS J · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Characterizing Hemodynamic Compensation and Stroke Risk in Stenosis PatientsR01NS078828 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DONAHUE, MANUS J · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NIH HHS S10 OD021771NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078828NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial vessel wall imaging (VWI) at a clinical field strength of 3T has become more widely available. However, how vessel measurements change with age and sex, over an age range spanning a typical lifespan, are needed. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess for identifiable changes in arterial wall thickness, outer vessel wall diameter, and lumen diameter with age cross-sectionally in healthy controls without cerebrovascular disease risk factors at the spatial resolution afforded by currently recommended 3T VWI approaches. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION/SUBJECTS: Healthy subjects (n = 82; age = 8-79 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T intracranial VWI, angiography, and T ASSESSMENT: Two readers measured lumen and outer wall diameters of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) and distal basilar artery. Wall thickness and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Separate linear regressions were performed to understand the relationship between wall measurements (lumen diameter, outer vessel wall diameter, and wall thickness) and age, gender, side (left or right); significance: two-sided P < 0.05.

resultsReaders showed excellent agreement for lumen and outer wall diameters (ICC 0.83-094). Linear regression of supraclinoid ICA wall measurements showed a statistically significant increase in wall thickness (P = 0.00051) and outer vessel wall diameter (P = 0.030) with age. ICA lumen and outer vessel wall diameters were statistically greater in males vs. females (lumen diameter 3.69 ± 0.41 vs. 3.54 ± 0.35 mm, P = 0.026; outer wall diameter 5.78 ± 0.52 vs. 5.56 ± 0.44 mm, P = 0.0089) with a trend toward increase in wall thickness (1.05 ± 0.12 vs. 1.01 ± 0.10 mm, P = 0.055). No significant difference was found in basilar artery wall thickness (P = 0.45, P = 0.72), lumen diameter (P = 0.15, P = 0.42), or outer vessel wall diameter (P = 0.34, P = 0.41) with age or gender, respectively. DATA

conclusionIntracranial vessel wall measurements were shown to be consistent between readers. At the available spatial resolution of 3T intracranial VWI sequences, supraclinoid ICA vessel wall thickness and outer vessel wall diameter appear to mildly increase with age. There was no detectable change in basilar artery vessel wall characteristics with age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1452-1460.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsBrainCarotid Artery, InternalCerebrovascular CirculationCerebrovascular DisordersChildFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMRIvessel wall imagingvessel wall thickness

Identifiers

PMID30994958
PMCPMC6800748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.