Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30994102›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2019

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Accuracy of Vaginal Self-Sampling for Screening Human Papillomavirus Types in Women from Rural Areas in Senegal.

Ndeye Safietou Fall, Catherine Tamalet, Nafissatou Diagne, Florence Fenollar, Didier Raoult, Cheikh Sokhna, Jean-Christophe Lagier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ndeye Safietou FallAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Catherine TamaletAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Marseille, France.
Nafissatou DiagneAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Florence FenollarAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Didier RaoultAix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Cheikh SokhnaAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Jean-Christophe LagierAix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRMéditerranée Infection Foundation · FRAix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginal self-sampling and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing can be useful tools for women with limited access to health care living in sub-Saharan Africa. To assess the feasibility and acceptability of vaginal self-sampling and high-risk HPV prevalence in two villages of central Senegal, women were asked to self-sample vaginal swabs for HPV detection in May, 2016. Vaginal swabs were collected from 133 women and were tested for HPV genotyping. The acceptability rate of vaginal self-sampling was 98.5%, and 99.2% of the women (133/134) used the device correctly. The quality of self-sampling was satisfactory in 100% of the samples; 10.5% of the samples were positive for HPV, including 6% with high-risk HPV types and 4% with low-risk HPV types. This preliminary study indicates that vaginal self-sampling is a valuable strategy for high-risk HPV detection and cervical cancer screening in a population of women not attending gynecologic screening in rural areas of Senegal.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationSpecimen HandlingAdultEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSenegalVaginal DiseasesVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID30994102
PMCPMC6553900
OpenAlexW2937042970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.