ReviewThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2019
Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape.
Review in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current progress in targeted pharmacotherapy to treat symptoms of major depressive disorder: moving from broad-spectrum treatments to precision psychiatry.CNS spectrums · 2025Review
- Data access arrangements in genomic research consortia.Scientific reports · 2024Review
- SHARE: An ethical framework for equitable data sharing in Caribbean health research.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024Article
- Toward a common standard for data and specimen provenance in life sciences.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- EasySMPC: a simple but powerful no-code tool for practical secure multiparty computation.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Data sharing across osteoarthritis research groups and disciplines: Opportunities and challenges.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2022Article
- Essential requirements for establishing and operating data trusts: practical guidance co-developed by representatives from fifteen canadian organizations and initiatives.International journal of population data science · 2020Article
- SCALEUS-FD: A FAIR Data Tool for Biomedical Applications.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Genomic Data-Sharing Practices.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
- Who Owns the Data in a Medical Information Commons?The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
- The Role of Participants in a Medical Information Commons.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
- Hopeful and Concerned: Public Input on Building a Trustworthy Medical Information Commons.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
- What is a Medical Information Commons?The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in technologies and biomedical informatics have expanded capacity to generate and share biomedical data. With a lens on genomic data, we present a typology characterizing the data-sharing landscape in biomedical research to advance understanding of the key stakeholders and existing data-sharing practices. The typology highlights the diversity of data-sharing efforts and facilitators and reveals how novel data-sharing efforts are challenging existing norms regarding the role of individuals whom the data describe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.