ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2019
Genomic Data-Sharing Practices.
Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- BRCA-CN: a blockchain-based framework to support public variant databases sharing in multi-center community for diagnostic reference and China regulatory science.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Communicating clearly about data sharing in genomics.Human genomics · 2025Review
- Creating personas for exposome research: the experience from the HEAP project.Open research Europe · 2023Article
- Sensor Data Integration: A New Cross-Industry Collaboration to Articulate Value, Define Needs, and Advance a Framework for Best Practices.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- A policy Delphi study to validate the key implications of data sharing (KIDS) framework for pediatric genomics in Canada.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Review
- Diversity, Profit, Control: An Empirical Study of Industry Employees' Views on Ethics in Private Sector Genomics.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Making data broadly accessible is essential to creating a medical information commons (MIC). Transparency about data-sharing practices can cultivate trust among prospective and existing MIC participants. We present an analysis of 34 initiatives sharing DNA-derived data based on public information. We describe data-sharing practices captured, including practices related to consent, privacy and security, data access, oversight, and participant engagement. Our results reveal that data-sharing initiatives have some distance to go in achieving transparency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.