Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30993811›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2019

Dyadic associations between perceived social support and cancer patient and caregiver health: An actor-partner interdependence modeling approach.

Dannielle E Kelley, Erin E Kent, Kristin Litzelman, Michelle A Mollica, Julia H Rowland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A dyadic approach to understanding anxiety and child overall health in pediatric oncology: insights from an actor-partner interdependence model.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Where you begin is not necessarily where you end: the mental and physical health trajectories of cancer caregivers over time.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dyadic effects of social support, illness uncertainty on anxiety and depression among lung cancer patients and their caregivers: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Motivation of patients with chronic cancer during COVID-19: a qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  18. Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Follow-up surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors of different sexual orientations.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dannielle E KelleyCancer Prevention Fellowship Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8123-2812
Erin E KentOutcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2503-2191
Kristin LitzelmanDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-5542-6434
Michelle A MollicaOutcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8092-3013
Julia H RowlandSmith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC.
National Cancer Institute · USSmith Center for Healing and the Arts · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Statistical Data Enclave CoreP30AG017266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Michal Engelman · 1999 to 2026
$17.0M
Lung/Colon Cancer Outcomes--Cancer Research NetworkU01CA093332 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI WEEKS, JANE C. · 2001 to 2008
$7.4M
RAND-UCLA CanCORS PDCR ApplicationU01CA093348 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI KAHN, KATHERINE LESLIE · 2001 to 2008
$7.3M
Cancer Care Outcomes Research &Surveillance ConsortiumU01CA093324 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z. · 2001 to 2008
$7.1M
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN END OF LIFE CARE--ACCESSU01CA093329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2008
$6.6M
NC Colorectal Cancer Care Outcomes Research StudyU01CA093326 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANDLER, ROBERT S. · 2001 to 2008
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093324NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093326NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093329NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093332NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093348NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSocial support may have a positive impact on health outcomes for patients and caregivers, but the extent to which social support and health outcomes are interrelated for both is unknown. We examine the dyadic interrelationships between social support and health among cancer patients and their caregivers.

methodsLung and colorectal cancer (CRC) patient and caregiver dyadic data were obtained from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. Patients and caregivers self-reported sociodemographic, social support, and caregiving characteristics at 5 (n = 218 lung; n = 222 CRC) or 12 months post-diagnosis (n = 198 lung; n = 290 CRC). Structural equation modeling was used to examine actor-partner interdependence models (APIM) of lung and CRC dyads at 5 and 12 months post-diagnosis.

resultsAt 5 months post-diagnosis, no interdependence between patient and caregiver social support was detected for CRC or lung dyads (all P > 0.05). At 12 months post diagnosis, no interdependence was detected for CRC dyads (all P > 0.70); lung dyads showed complete interdependence, indicating patient social support is associated with better caregiver self-reported health (β = 0.15, P < 0.001), and caregiver social support is associated with better patient self-reported health (β = 0.18, P < 0.001).

conclusionSocial support has a positive impact on patient and caregiver perceived health across the cancer trajectory, and these effects may differ by cancer site and time. Future research and translational efforts are needed to identify effective ways to bolster both patient and caregiver social support and to determine critical moments for intervention.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionSocial SupportAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedCaregiversColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSelf ConceptSelf Reportactor-partner interdependence modelingcaregivercolorectal cancerdyadshealth statuslung cancerpatientSocial Contextual Frameworksocial support

Identifiers

PMID30993811
PMCPMC6749989
OpenAlexW2939019852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.