Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30993619›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Teaching the Social Determinants of Health in Undergraduate Medical Education: a Scoping Review.

Ashti Doobay-Persaud, Mark D Adler, Tami R Bartell, Natalie E Sheneman, Mayra D Martinez, Karen A Mangold, Patricia Smith, Karen M Sheehan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Qualitative Content Analysis Exploring Systems-Based Practice Across Health Professional Competency Standards.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashti Doobay-PersaudDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. a-doobay-persaud@northwestern.edu.
Mark D AdlerDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tami R BartellMary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach and Advocacy Center, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Natalie E ShenemanCenter for Global Health, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mayra D MartinezCenter for Global Health, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Karen A MangoldDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Patricia SmithGalter Health Sciences Library, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Karen M SheehanDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo provide optimal care, medical students should understand that the social determinants of health (SDH) impact their patients' well-being. Those charged with teaching SDH to future physicians, however, face a paucity of curricular guidance.

objectiveThis review's objective is to map key characteristics from publications about teaching SDH to students in undergraduate medical education (UME).

methodsIn 2016, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane and ERIC databases, bibliographies, and MedEdPORTAL for articles published between January 2010 and November 2016. Four reviewers screened articles for eligibility then extracted and analyzed data descriptively. Scoping review methodology was used to map key concepts and curricular logistics as well as educator and student characteristics.

resultsThe authors screened 3571 unique articles of which 22 were included in the final review. Many articles focused on community engagement (15). Experiential learning was a common instructional strategy (17) and typically took the form of community or clinic-based learning. Nearly half (10) of the manuscripts described school-wide curricula, of which only three spanned a full year. The majority of assessment was self-reported (20) and often related to affective change. Few studies objectively assessed learner outcomes (2).

conclusionsThe abundance of initial articles screened highlights the growing interest in SDH in medical education. The small number of selected articles with sufficient detail for abstraction demonstrates limited SDH curricular dissemination. A lack of accepted tools or practices that limit development of robust learner or program evaluation was noted. Future research should focus on identifying and evaluating effective instructional and assessment methodologies to address this gap, exploring additional innovative teaching frameworks, and examining the specific contexts and characteristics of marginalized and underserved populations and their coverage in medical education.

Indexed as

Social Determinants of HealthEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFaculty, MedicalHumansSchools, Medicalhealth equityscoping reviewsocial determinants of healthundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID30993619
PMCPMC6502919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.