Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30993546›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019

The Current and Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy for Central Nervous System Metastases from Breast Cancer.

Shyam Tanguturi, Laura E G Warren

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shyam TanguturiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, ASB1, L2, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Laura E G WarrenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, ASB1, L2, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. lewarren@partners.org.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFor patients with breast cancer who develop brain metastases, radiation therapy (RT) provides local control. Here, we review the current role for central nervous system RT, particularly focusing on the evolving role for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). RECENT

findingsSRS treats only known CNS disease as opposed to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), which treats the entire brain parenchyma. SRS has been found to cause less neurocognitive decline than WBRT. SRS is currently utilized in patients with four or fewer brain metastases, but several ongoing trials are examining the use of SRS for greater than four metastases. For patients requiring WBRT, hippocampal avoidance WBRT and memantine concurrent with and adjuvant to WBRT have been found to reduce the risk of neurocognitive decline. Both SRS and WBRT are used as a local therapy for brain metastases. SRS is increasingly preferred given fewer long-term neurocognitive side effects.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCognitionCranial IrradiationFemaleHumansMeningeal NeoplasmsPrognosisRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryBrain metastasesBreast cancerCentral nervous system metastasesNeurocognitionRadiation therapyRadiosurgerySide effectsSRSStereotactic radiationWhole-brain radiation

Identifiers

PMID30993546
OpenAlexW2938138281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.